Viewing profile — fjuerfilis
fjuerfilis
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Oct 28, 2018, 5:20 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 34
- Public activity
- 13 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About fjuerfilis
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #18495368
Sigh, so true. Heartening that Shor has the same thoughts about the grant system that I do. I don't have quite the same critical perspective as the blogger, but I think there's a c…
-
comment
Comment #18473816
I have such mixed feelings about this piece. On the one hand, I'm extremely grateful for it drawing attention to these types of problems with credit. On the other, I feel like it v…
-
comment
Comment #18403173
The idea of free will sort of deriving from some properties of particles is interesting. I admit there's a lot to our understanding of things from a fundamental physical perspectiv…
-
comment
Comment #18399669
Yes, it's the nocebo effect. I personally think it figures prominently in psychosomatic pathologies actually. People with [psycho]somatic symptom disorders, with medically unexplai…
-
comment
Comment #18399560
The statement about falsification mechanisms is incorrect. In fact, one of the problems with the Myers-Briggs is that it is continuously brought up in these discussions, even when …
-
comment
Comment #18399372
Yes, I agree that is one model, but what I wrestle with ultimately I suppose is whether indeterminism per se is what defines free will, in part or whole. If you have a prior state …
-
comment
Comment #18399097
I had a similar reaction. Nondeterministic conceptions of free will similar to that of this paper are really more like an intoxicated state or something, where behavioral outcomes …
-
comment
Comment #18395748
Yeah, I agree. I do research on things very closely related to voting systems, and my first thought is approval voting. It's basically rating with two options, approve and disappro…
-
comment
Comment #18382339
I think all of this is generally a step in the right direction but am worried about where it is leading, for two reasons: 1. My experience with the frontiers of open access science…
-
comment
Comment #18366379
... not a physicist here, but I do research on applied information theory and statistics. This grandfather's paper is sort of interesting to me because it starts to creep into some…
-
comment
Comment #18354259
It's worse than that. The current system was tested on 30 people with 50% base rate of lying. Even if they bring it up to 85% accuracy with 50% base rate, by the time you are deali…
-
comment
Comment #18337568
I'd second that. R and Python both have the same pre-LLVM performance issues. I don't expect either R or Python to go away either time soon, nor would I want them to, but I would l…
-
comment
Comment #18321756
It sounds to me that what is being monetized is the authority of doctors. I think what you've described is really the US healthcare system as a whole. I really don't understand why…