Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — fixf

fixf

HN member
Joined
Mon, Jun 17, 2019, 11:47 PM UTC
HN karma
-2
Public activity
16 items

About fixf

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #22861510

    I have GOL running on my keyboard. You will be missed but not forgotten.

  2. comment
    Comment #21851024

    They could, though I think much of that can be mitigated with effort. I believe the textbook example is domestic abuse, but I worry that the scope also coincides with fallout from …

  3. comment
    Comment #21848842

    Against the use of double binds. To me they are an indicator of hostile intent, although as demonstrated here and in the practice of law, adversarial interactions can be constructi…

  4. comment
    Comment #21845318

    Glad to hear that. The Freemium solution is certainly a simple one, but I didn't feel it was appropos. Personally I'd have to start writing a day ahead to have a chance at formaliz…

  5. comment
    Comment #21845129

    Not at all. It's correct that this problem is formally recognized as a false paradox. It is a thought experiment infamous for its illustrative misuse in relation to other areas. "W…

  6. comment
    Comment #21843718

    I share a similar view, that testing whether the examiner is lying is itself worthwhile. But while the analysis has several interpretations this question may pose the agency a smal…

  7. comment
    Comment #21843200

    What is your agency's policy for answering Newcomb's problem?

  8. comment
    Comment #21842660

    Well met, and thanks for identifying the solution using overhead.

  9. comment
    Comment #21842542

    Good point, loose language on my part. I am thinking of false positives or collision. The required statistical properties aren't met.

  10. comment
  11. comment
    Comment #21842101

    The minimum number motivated to work is also the cheapest. 2 was simply deemed insecure.

  12. comment
    Comment #21704727

    There's multiple bounds. The mounting evidence for BPP=BQP unfortunately falls aside P=BPP for evidence without proof. The weak interpretation is that BQP is vulnerable, and the st…

  13. comment
    Comment #21691710

    I find it amusing that I didn't say anything for OR against, just mentioned them and that apparently someone 'disagrees.' With what, an inaccuracy? Then post a reply. Just voting s…

  14. comment
    Comment #21668436

    Self squared dragons and monstrous moonshine.

  15. comment
    Comment #21664312

    No, it's much more likely that BTC was a state funded vehicle for surveillance. Take that with a grain of salt, I could be totally wrong.

  16. comment
    Comment #20246615

    Buboard may be assuming that performance is greatly influenced by skill and that skill is learned rather than innate, leaving a 'string of failure' in the learning process. Probabi…