Viewing profile — fixf
fixf
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jun 17, 2019, 11:47 PM UTC
- HN karma
- -2
- Public activity
- 16 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About fixf
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #22861510
I have GOL running on my keyboard. You will be missed but not forgotten.
-
comment
Comment #21851024
They could, though I think much of that can be mitigated with effort. I believe the textbook example is domestic abuse, but I worry that the scope also coincides with fallout from …
-
comment
Comment #21848842
Against the use of double binds. To me they are an indicator of hostile intent, although as demonstrated here and in the practice of law, adversarial interactions can be constructi…
-
comment
Comment #21845318
Glad to hear that. The Freemium solution is certainly a simple one, but I didn't feel it was appropos. Personally I'd have to start writing a day ahead to have a chance at formaliz…
-
comment
Comment #21845129
Not at all. It's correct that this problem is formally recognized as a false paradox. It is a thought experiment infamous for its illustrative misuse in relation to other areas. "W…
-
comment
Comment #21843718
I share a similar view, that testing whether the examiner is lying is itself worthwhile. But while the analysis has several interpretations this question may pose the agency a smal…
-
comment
Comment #21843200
What is your agency's policy for answering Newcomb's problem?
-
comment
Comment #21842660
Well met, and thanks for identifying the solution using overhead.
-
comment
Comment #21842542
Good point, loose language on my part. I am thinking of false positives or collision. The required statistical properties aren't met.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #21842101
The minimum number motivated to work is also the cheapest. 2 was simply deemed insecure.
-
comment
Comment #21704727
There's multiple bounds. The mounting evidence for BPP=BQP unfortunately falls aside P=BPP for evidence without proof. The weak interpretation is that BQP is vulnerable, and the st…
-
comment
Comment #21691710
I find it amusing that I didn't say anything for OR against, just mentioned them and that apparently someone 'disagrees.' With what, an inaccuracy? Then post a reply. Just voting s…
-
comment
Comment #21668436
Self squared dragons and monstrous moonshine.
-
comment
Comment #21664312
No, it's much more likely that BTC was a state funded vehicle for surveillance. Take that with a grain of salt, I could be totally wrong.
-
comment
Comment #20246615
Buboard may be assuming that performance is greatly influenced by skill and that skill is learned rather than innate, leaving a 'string of failure' in the learning process. Probabi…