Viewing profile — fivefives55555

> I'd expect a decent food journalist to ask if their conditions of payment for endorsement required their support in these times. From the article: > Mr. Chang and Mr. Samuelsson …

I've been following this on X/Twitter and I think one of the most egregious things that's important to point out is that folks from Phrack reached out to Proton in private multiple…

> If you only have the capability to ban 10 people, you are going to be very judicious in who you ban. But how do you arrive at this limit? Why 10? Why not 100? Why not 0?

> There's essentially a contract between people and the state whereby most people accept that there are traffic laws that they'll loosely follow and the state can enforce the laws …

> If each security guard has the entire database What I meant was that each security guard has a certain subset of the database, so they're only responsible for scanning for those …

I'm having the same exact issue. I don't understand the argument that many here seem to implicitly be making, that "businesses should be allowed to ban as many people as they can w…

I guess my question is then, what is the limit? Should a business be allowed to bar as many people as it can do so without using automated technology?

> I think the difference between automated image recognition and security guards with clipboards is one of scale. It would simply be impossible to have images of lawyers from acros…

First just a disclaimer that I am not a proponent of facial recognition technology (I think it has a number of significant faults). That being said, it does not seem like facial re…

This was a paper in a journal titled Advances in Materials Science and Engineering. Which doesn't sound like a social science journal, but hard to tell nowadays.

The question the editors should be asking of their peer reviewers is: why was neither this, nor any of the other glaring errors spotted during the process of peer review, a process…