Viewing profile — finnn
finnn
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jun 24, 2013, 4:25 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,652
- Public activity
- 558 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About finnn
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #34749807
ah yes, another fork of BirdSiteLive. Every one seems to make their own fork of that thing. And none of them (that I've found) set a user agent when delivering messages to other AP…
-
comment
Comment #31634608
oh wow HN is parroting this bullshit again. Moxie and Signal didn't do anything other than asking LibreSignal politely to stop using their servers. They didn't "shut down" anything…
-
comment
Comment #29003662
https://www.freshports.org/net-im/signald/
-
comment
Comment #27684181
Could you point me to some of those instances?
-
comment
Comment #27684127
Okay, that's fair. I interpreted them as a response to the original question about if the policy is enforced.
-
comment
Comment #27684072
We know the policy, no one is confused about the policy, all 3rd party clients violate the policy. Is the policy enforced? I've seen no evidence of it.
-
comment
Comment #27683859
I'm looking for people's experience interacting with the Signal server , not moxie. We're talking about if the server enforces any kind of client restrictions. I haven't looked sup…
-
comment
Comment #27683638
Sorry what am I looking for in this 200 comment reddit thread? I don't see any comments from moxie himself, just a lot of other people claiming to know what moxie wants. Are there …
-
comment
Comment #27683552
signal-cli uses a clearly identifiable user agent [0] that could easily be blocked if Signal wanted to. signal-cli could escalate by trying to evade that kind of a block, but as it…
-
comment
Comment #27683482
I said it's not enforced. I cannot speak for moxie or Signal. I can speak for my own experiences, as the maintainer of a fork of signal-cli, and I have never seen any evidence that…
-
comment
Comment #27683374
It's not a licensing restriction, it's a terms of use for their network service. It's also not enforced. Their clients are open source, signal-cli uses a fork of the Android app's …
-
comment
Comment #27683362
signald is a fork of signal-cli
-
comment
Comment #26939658
yes, send it to your own phone number, just like all the real Signal clients.
-
comment
Comment #26939070
there are matrix bridges for all three of those https://github.com/tulir/mautrix-whatsapp https://github.com/Half-Shot/matrix-appservice-discord https://github.com/matrix-org/matri…
-
comment
Comment #26939013
signald also comes with a cli called signaldctl: https://signald.org/signaldctl/
-
comment
Comment #26939002
the signal matrix bridge currently listed on matrix.org ( https://github.com/tulir/mautrix-signal ) uses signald
-
comment
Comment #26938993
a pidgin (libpurple) plugin actually exists already: https://github.com/hoehermann/libpurple-signald I'd like to improve the website to better showcase the clients
-
comment
Comment #26938697
This daemon handles as much of the weird signal-specific stuff and exposes an easier to use API. It handles things like encrypting and decrypting messages, generating and storing k…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #26938229
well "signal-cli" is already in use by https://github.com/AsamK/signal-cli (which signald is a fork of)
-
comment
Comment #26938220
This is a tool to build Signal clients with. It handles the Signal-specific stuff, clients can communicate with via a unix socket.
-
comment
Comment #26938193
signald author here, open to suggestions on that name. As you've noticed, I try to avoid using the word "signal". I do agree that the current name is pretty awkward. edit: the name…
-
comment
Comment #24459246
https://gitlab.com/thefinn93/signald/-/issues/52#note_406669... has some details about the issues running Chatty with libpurple-signald
-
comment
Comment #16535281
Sounds like you're describing an SRV recrod
- story