Viewing profile — finiteparadox
finiteparadox
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Oct 29, 2019, 5:39 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 3
- Public activity
- 9 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About finiteparadox
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #44433009
I think you are missing the point a bit. With staging you can build up arbitrary levels of compile time abstractions and be sure that they will not appear in the final executable. …
-
comment
Comment #44413563
The point is that compiler optimisations are a black box and not guaranteed. They can be very brittle wrt to seemingly harmless source changes (even something as simple as making a…
-
comment
Comment #44346180
This sort of flow works well for me with obsidian+paperpile+latex
-
comment
Comment #43515747
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #43423934
A combination of staging and effects might be a candidate. Any other candidate will probably be staging + X. https://se.cs.uni-tuebingen.de/publications/schuster19zero.p...
- comment
-
comment
Comment #35086255
If tree is a category, does it have limits?
-
comment
Comment #32270382
Incredible, one would expect this to be theoretically possible since Typescript's type system is Turing complete, but it is certainly different to see it done in practice. Wow!
-
comment
Comment #26422994
This is just plain wrong. There's nothing you can do in C/C++ (or C+, as you put it) that you can't in rust, when it comes to parallelism. There's always unsafe if you really need …