Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — findjashua

findjashua

HN member
Joined
Sun, Jan 26, 2014, 5:09 PM UTC
HN karma
721
Public activity
432 items

About findjashua

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48372233

    nasdaq & russell, yes. but not s&p - that has a 6-month requirement for eligibility, which ensures stock is past the lock-up period.

  2. comment
    Comment #48359865

    almost all 401k plans offer funds based on s&p 500, not nasdaq/russell others. s&p has also halved their trading days requirement from 1 yr to 6 months, but that's still sufficient…

  3. comment
    Comment #48229710

    It's not even a fair comparison - the effort involved in learning and building stuff from the internet (in the pre-LLM era) is an order of magnitude higher than turning your OAI/An…

  4. comment
    Comment #47172516

    won't this essentially disable prompt caching, that you get from a standard append-only chat history?

  5. comment
    Comment #47156281

    failed the car wash test. i think instead of postiioning as a general purpuse reasoning model, they'd have more success focusing on a specific use case (eg coding agent) and benchm…

  6. comment
    Comment #46904872

    you need a reviewer agent for every step of the process - review the plan generated by the planner, the update made by the task worker subagent, and a final reviewer once all tasks…

  7. comment
    Comment #46268849

    providers' ToS explicitly states whether or not any data provided is used for training purposes. the usual that i've seen is that while they retain the right to use the data on fre…

  8. comment
    Comment #46196355

    20-yr CAGR seems to be consistently higher than SP500: https://testfol.io/?s=7boYMdNxqjh

  9. comment
    Comment #46141456

    i workshop a detailed outline w it first, and once i'm happy w the plan/outline, i let it run while i go do something else

  10. comment
    Comment #46127836

    NME at all - 5.1 codex has been the best by far.

  11. comment
    Comment #45651993

    i think the standard recommendation is to do range partitioning on the hash of the key, aka hash range partitioning (i know yugabyte supports this out of the box, i'd be surprised …

  12. comment
    Comment #45451712

    RAG != EBR

  13. comment
    Comment #43967406

    why can't you create separate git worktrees, and open each worktree in a separate IDE window? then you get the same functionality, no?

  14. comment
    Comment #43689877

    the broker should be adjusting the cost basis in the 1099 to account for wash sale. are you not seeing that? what broker are you using?

  15. comment
    Comment #42726041

    I had checked out SPR, but found the workflow based around reordering history via interactive rebase unintuitive & clunky. That was the motivation behind building this on my own. I…

  16. comment
    Comment #42718407

    I miss Phabricator from my time at Meta so much, I made this to achieve a Phabricator-like stacked-commit experience via the git cli: https://pypi.org/project/stacksmith/

  17. comment
    Comment #42381536

    Shameless self-promotion: https://pypi.org/project/stacksmith/

  18. comment
  19. comment
    Comment #42219331

    Every single person I know who pays for an LLM is a developer who pays for Claude because of coding ability

  20. comment
    Comment #41922094

    for a lot of tasks that aren't as cut & dry, i often find myself having to provide it pseudo code, which it can then one-shot to working code. don't get me wrong, it's still a mass…

  21. comment
    Comment #39446125

    +1 for Sceptre. Mine is coming up on 7 years, and I've never had any maintenance issues w it.

  22. comment
    Comment #39277957

    hash based partitioning makes repartitioning very expensive. most distributed DB now use key-range based partitioning. Iirc, Dynamo which introduced this concept has also made the …

  23. comment
    Comment #39212200

    LM Studio is the easiest way to do it

  24. comment
    Comment #39211834

    did a comparison on LM Studio - the answers are eerily similar, but Mixtral is way way faster. Codellama-70B is slow to the point of being unusable. (M1 Max, 64 GB RAM)

  25. comment
    Comment #39211393

    do you find Mixtral to be better than the new 70B one that Meta released a couple days back as well?