Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — fiberoptick

fiberoptick

HN member
Joined
Wed, Jun 30, 2010, 1:57 AM UTC
HN karma
198
Public activity
30 items

About fiberoptick

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #30855785

    The perfect example for how bloated, inefficient, and wasteful the bureaucracies of higher education can become. How did $40m of fraudulent spending go unchecked for literally year…

  2. comment
    Comment #27130821

    This could have been an immensely powerful covert communications channel for field operators of military and intelligence services

  3. comment
    Comment #26904492

    Well, at companies that actually care about 100% rollout of "corporate, invasive crapware" on computers that _they own_ and that are used to process _company data_ and access _comp…

  4. comment
    Comment #26713392

    End of an era... Are there any viable alternatives to Kubernetes and Nomad?

  5. comment
    Comment #25777420

    I wonder where this leaves the AWS-sponsored Open Distro for Elasticsearch? ( https://opendistro.github.io/for-elasticsearch/ ) Seems to me that they have no choice but to hard for…

  6. comment
    Comment #25777282

    Copyright law is the basis for the legal enforcement of software licenses. License violations usually get pursued under copyright law

  7. comment
    Comment #25296999

    There are state laws that require financial institutions to do this actually. Their hands are tied here. It's called "escheatment". https://www.sec.gov/fast-answers/answersescheath…

  8. comment
    Comment #24736102

    > does not directly answer to any legislative, judicial, or executive authority. This is patently false. The Securities and Exchange Commission accredits and oversees all national …

  9. comment
    Comment #24416434

    Should be corrected to "Vendor-Locks", as well.

  10. comment
    Comment #24416427

    Does this defend against any additional attack surface that wasn't already defended by the UEFI Secure Boot standard?

  11. comment
    Comment #24247853

    Your comment is technically correct, but misleading. In fact California specifically does not tax ex-residents for income arising from the disposition of stock acquired with ISOs, …

  12. story
  13. comment
    Comment #22762161

    Bad, in my view. (Although I am not a lawyer, and would definitely appreciate input from one here!) Hardware offload of a network protocol is an extremely generic concept and this …

  14. comment
    Comment #22761992

    And emerging QUIC acceleration technology is likely to be stifled by intellectual property laws. Intel has already filed (in 2019) for a European patent that seems to claim invento…

  15. comment
    Comment #22594632

    Embrace, extend, extinguish.

  16. comment
    Comment #22570077

    I noticed that throughout this thread you have been making this assertion. Could you share any data or citations to support this? Would you feel any differently about the value of …

  17. comment
  18. comment
    Comment #22568298

    Wow, an ATO exploit that only received a $6,500 bounty? This signals to grey-/black-hat researchers that their research efforts or Slack bug disclosures are best directed elsewhere…

  19. comment
    Comment #22339976

    The FOSS community would be a lot safer if Oracle didn't exist.

  20. comment
    Comment #22188147

    Are there any decent alternatives to Unifi APs or home switches and routers? Willing to pay a modest premium, even.

  21. comment
    Comment #22051890

    There's a subtle difference between AGPL and the Commons Clause licenses. AGPL requires network-accessible code to be disclosed & licensed under an AGPL-compatible license. The Com…

  22. comment
    Comment #18893527

    The third demo screenshot [1], which contains a toy implementation of AES in CBC mode, is a great example of why cryptography is hard to get right. Implementation is best left to c…

  23. comment
  24. comment
    Comment #10428988

    Why did they publish his SF-86? This seems like a very irresponsible invasion of Brennan's personal privacy; nothing in there could possibly be of legitimate public interest.

  25. comment
    Comment #10094163

    Describing a contract as "bulletproof" and drafted by "top attorneys" is likely considered puffery [1] under the law, and should be fine in my opinion. [1] https://en.wikipedia.org…