Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — fheinsen

fheinsen

HN member
Joined
Thu, Oct 24, 2019, 4:01 PM UTC
HN karma
106
Public activity
32 items

About fheinsen

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #46924549

    The github repository's first toy example is with 8 Taylor terms, applied to a context with 1B tokens, each token with 1K heads: https://github.com/glassroom/sata_attention That to…

  2. comment
    Comment #46924436

    Unlike previous efforts, which typically stop at a low-order (e.g., quadratic) term of the Taylor expansion, this work derives a succinct, efficient, parallel general method for ap…

  3. comment
    Comment #46899673

    As far as I know, there is no widely accepted explanation for context rot. Numerical error in long sequences of query-key dot-products may be a key factor.

  4. comment
    Comment #46889911

    Yes, there must be a connection. While adaptive truncation may prove impractical, it should be possible to measure spectral statistics on sample data, and specify a different fixed…

  5. comment
    Comment #46889155

    [3] is linear attention, https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.16236 , a well-known result with ~3K citations: https://scholar.google.com/scholar_lookup?arxiv_id=2006.1623...

  6. comment
    Comment #46888888

    This is a form of linear attention ( https://arxiv.org/abs/2006.16236 ) that approximates standard scaled dot-product attention to arbitrary precision, by adding Taylor terms in an…

  7. comment
    Comment #46888487

    The method is more general. The github repository's first example is with eight Taylor terms (P = 8).

  8. comment
    Comment #46887434

    As the error via linear approximation approaches similar magnitude as numerical error via quadratic computation, don’t the two start becoming comparable in practice ? I ask because…

  9. story
  10. comment
    Comment #45611874

    Yes. See this comment for context: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45611863

  11. comment
    Comment #45611868

    To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time anyone has successfully trained a non-diagonal RNN computed in parallel, via prefix scan, without requiring any form of stabili…

  12. comment
    Comment #45611863

    The manuscript formally defines GOOMs as a set of mathematical objects, shows that floating-point formats are a special case of GOOMs, and notes that they extend prior work on loga…

  13. story
  14. comment
    Comment #45605149

    The paper formally defines GOOMs as the subset of the complex plane that elementwise exponentiates to the real line. We'll update the README to make that clearer. Thank you for poi…

  15. story
  16. comment
    Comment #45559542

    > GOOMs generalize the concept of "order of magnitude" to incorporate complex numbers that exponentiate to real ones. As with ordinary orders of magnitude, GOOMs are more stable th…

  17. story
  18. comment
    Comment #45527808

    repo: https://github.com/glassroom/generalized_orders_of_magnitude

  19. story
  20. story
  21. story
  22. comment
    Comment #21764263

    I'm the author of that paper. Happy to answer questions about it here.

  23. comment
    Comment #21464797

    Hi HN, I'm the author of this paper. As it turns out, I posted it and answered a few questions about it on HN a few days ago, on this thread: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=2…

  24. comment
    Comment #21441261

    Thanks. Will do (work permitting!). FWIW, a while back I reimplemented and tinkered a bit with the Sabour et al. version too... and did not see much promise in it. Note that the ro…

  25. comment
    Comment #21434046

    FYI, I reached out to two of those individuals (one is a CVPR reviewer, it turns out) and both suggested I first upload this to arXiv, so I did that yesterday. The paper is now sta…