Viewing profile — fghfghfghfghfgh
fghfghfghfghfgh
HN member- Joined
- Wed, May 08, 2019, 11:53 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 201
- Public activity
- 38 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About fghfghfghfghfgh
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #34803159
From a girlfriend who was my intellectually superior (which I had a hard time dealing with) You are responsible for your actions - no one else. "But I did it because...". No. You c…
-
comment
Comment #34388799
I don’t know Gilbert Ryle but I believe I understand the paper as intended. What do they realize then instead?
-
comment
Comment #34336286
Can you elaborate on why you think the paper is flawed please?
-
comment
Comment #30374696
“… rules are coordination mechanisms that carry the capacity to destroy value” Excellent phrasing :)
-
comment
Comment #28620841
> This is an abstract response to a concrete demonstration of usefulness. Brilliantly articulated - thank you. I wonder if this is a generic pattern (like fallacies)?
-
comment
Comment #28557166
It’s one guy. Making a useful tool. It even has an altruistic purpose. Shame on you for twisting a well intended effort into a negative statement that suits your narrow identity po…
-
comment
Comment #28389928
How has it been corrupted?
-
comment
Comment #28245042
Because the word "housewife" invokes a fuller mental image of what general boring conditions those two women might be living under?
-
comment
Comment #28222764
From a manager point of view: In your shoes I would make a decision to either fix/improve the situation or leave immediately. If you decide for the former then make sure you have s…
-
comment
Comment #27693859
You're right - not the best analogy in this case. Not sure about the race car though. I will think about that. Analogies aside... Let's agree that estimation is possible to a certa…
-
comment
Comment #27689546
Complexity exists in interaction between parts - not necessarily the parts themselves. Breaking down a project do not take those interactions into account. Even if we were to try c…
-
comment
Comment #27673865
I make a distinction between physical violence and what you refer to as harm. I do not believe people must be protected from harm in that manner. Words can be hurtful but they do n…
-
comment
Comment #27667115
Those statements are not in opposition to each other, > Because obviously walking around and insulting people based on their race or religion is an act of violence If you define an…
-
comment
Comment #27666914
> Plenty of people are being harassed in public for their sexuality, race, etc. Harassment, regardless of motive, is illegal. Is there a need to make it more illegal? > you don't n…
-
comment
Comment #27665691
You're conflating the right to express oneself with the right to act violently. Those two are not the same hence the same logic does not apply.
-
comment
Comment #27665537
That's a very big "just". What good is an opinion if you cannot express it?
-
comment
Comment #27660391
Hating someone is an opinion. It is not an act of violence. I disagree with both of those laws.
-
comment
Comment #27660375
We are talking about freedom to speak - not freedom to kill.
-
comment
Comment #27660001
Consequences and freedom are two separate things don't you think? If you openly state that you hate a certain group of people that will have consequences. I still support your free…
-
comment
Comment #27659168
Freedom of speech is absolute. One cannot outlaw what one does not want to hear. If you want your freedom to speak you are required to let other people speak. It's really that simp…
-
comment
Comment #27464149
"Paul Graham believed it was much easier to teach great Software Hackers how to business..." I agree "And your organization with 3 levels of technical management and all those divi…
-
comment
Comment #27461278
I don't think it's an issue with my argument but I do think the difficulty of grasping the bigger picture is a major issue. It can be reluctance to understand why you're doing what…
-
comment
Comment #27461113
Ha - yes, you're right it sounds like a tautology. I worded my answer to reflect the absolute statement of no manager is ever needed. "Shouldn't the creators and clients have a maj…
-
comment
Comment #27461061
My answer was intentionally phrased to mirror the absolutism of the GP. A large part of my time is spent explaining why certain process is in place or why we cannot get a license f…
-
comment
Comment #27461034
Nah, we're not talking past each other but we likely come from wildly different backgrounds. To make a general statement saying managers are not needed is as silly as saying all de…