Viewing profile — fffs

It's because this is a fundamental redefinition of the difference between women and men, one which seriously disadvantages women. When this ideological stance of "trans women are w…

This doesn't really address the criticism, for several reasons: 1. Males who identify as women are a heterogenous group that mostly consist of those who have not undergone the 'who…

> And trans people, why do people feel the need to criticize them? Let them be who they are, they're not harming anyone. The criticism is this: a woman's right to a single-sex spac…

Indeed, I feel especially honoured that you laboured over so many paragraphs, in all their verbosity, to dismiss an opinion that means almost nothing to you.

I found your response very amusing, though perhaps not in a way you would appreciate. Thank you for taking the time to write all that out for my enjoyment.

Okay then, if you've read her work - which by that I assume you mean her book on this topic, and perhaps some of her articles as well - which aspects of it do you consider pseudo-s…

I placed it in quotes because I see it as a disputed concept that not everyone considers to be valid, and which doesn't even have a consistent definition amongst those who do. The …

If you're going to comment critically on her work, maybe it would be best for you to read it yourself and form your own evaluation? Seems rather odd for you to be expressing this i…

She's not stating anything pseudoscientific, nor anything that has been debunked. Quite the opposite really. Her work is meticulously well researched and she takes a satisfyingly r…

She's said a fair bit on the topic of DSDs, for example these tweets: - https://twitter.com/HJoyceGender/status/1488064619428122625 - https://twitter.com/HJoyceGender/status/149603…

[dead]

> Is your point that you alone can stare down medical science and proclaim that congenital adrenal hyperplasia and aromatase deficiency don't exist? That's not what she is saying a…