Viewing profile — felix9527
felix9527
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Mar 09, 2026, 9:04 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 3
- Public activity
- 11 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About felix9527
Recent public activity
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #47411495
We instrument production services with traces and structured logging. AI agents that touch the same codebase? Most people have zero visibility once the session ends. The scrollback…
-
comment
Comment #47411476
The study only looks at what lands in the PR. In my experience a single prompt can trigger 20+ tool calls, most of them reads and greps. The final diff is a tiny fraction of what a…
-
comment
Comment #47388761
The article treats this as AI being stupid, but it's a design category error. Spotify is applying rules ("don't repeat artists," "mix genres") to a system whose behavior space is u…
-
comment
Comment #47364428
Been running Claude Code with hooks recording every tool call for two weeks. ~25k actions across 116 sessions. The thing that surprised me: 24 tool calls per prompt on average. "Ju…
-
comment
Comment #47349365
Exactly. The moment an agent touches prod, "we logged it" isn't enough — you need "here's the cryptographic proof of what happened, and you can verify it without trusting us." Comp…
-
comment
Comment #47348888
Sure — it's at https://github.com/PunkGo/punkgo-jack It hooks into PostToolUse, PreToolUse, SessionStart/End, and UserPromptSubmit. Each event gets submitted to a local kernel that…
-
comment
Comment #47348742
The core problem this article surfaces is forensic: once the agent session ends, the evidence is whatever the vendor chose to log. Terminal scrollback is lossy, session logs are ve…
-
comment
Comment #47348703
Interesting approach to the PreToolUse side. I've been building on the other end — PostToolUse hooks that commit every tool call to an append-only Merkle tree (RFC 6962 transparenc…
- story