Viewing profile — feastingonslop
feastingonslop
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Dec 07, 2025, 4:31 AM UTC
- HN karma
- -14
- Public activity
- 26 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About feastingonslop
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46985466
Nor does it stop self-respecting LLMs.
-
comment
Comment #46971220
What value is there in tested code when you have the option of superlative, flawless code?
-
comment
Comment #46971196
LLMs write superior code. Maybe they learned from humans, but they have seen further while standing on those shoulders.
-
comment
Comment #46971134
If the LLM writes better code (and it will) then its code should be favored over a library.
-
comment
Comment #46970972
Why would you not?
-
comment
Comment #46970740
It doesn’t mess up. Not any more.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #46942690
> Everyone can treat the project as a black box, and focus on observable changes to the project's behavior. This is a good thing. I don’t need to focus on oil refineries when I fil…
- comment
-
story
Goal: Ship 1M Lines of Code Daily
Life is good.
-
comment
Comment #46929540
Since the code does not matter , you wouldn’t need or want to phrase it in terms of algorithmic complexity. You surely would have a more real world requirement, like, if the data s…
-
comment
Comment #46928870
If you have particular performance requirements like that, then include them. Test for them. You still don’t have to actually look at the code. Either the software meets expectatio…
-
comment
Comment #46928437
And that is the right assumption. Why would any humans need (or even want) to look at code any more? That’s like saying you want to go manually inspect the oil refinery every time …
-
comment
Comment #46928270
The code itself does not matter. If the tests pass, and the tests are good, then who cares? AI will be maintaining the code.
-
comment
Comment #46926215
Nobody is saying to skip testing the software. Testing is still important. What the code itself looks like, isn’t.
-
comment
Comment #46924938
And there was a time when using libraries and frameworks was the right thing to do, for that very reason. But LLMs have the equivalent of way more experience than any single progra…
-
comment
Comment #46923897
I don’t understand the interest in “quality code.” I never need to look at the code itself. I just make sure it runs right.
-
comment
Comment #46923820
Which LLM works best for Racket?
-
comment
Comment #46749398
Why build software slower than possible? Do you just enjoy wasting people’s time?
- comment
-
comment
Comment #46701005
Yes, but it would be bored.
-
comment
Comment #46676026
Why do you think vibe code isn’t good enough for real products? Just so long as you have tests that show it functions as expected, why does it matter?
-
comment
Comment #46584139
I thought it seemed like an especially good read!
-
comment
Comment #46561662
Excellent! Humans can then spend their time on other activities, rather than get bogged down in the mundane.
- comment