Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — feastingonslop

feastingonslop

HN member
Joined
Sun, Dec 07, 2025, 4:31 AM UTC
HN karma
-14
Public activity
26 items

About feastingonslop

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #46985466

    Nor does it stop self-respecting LLMs.

  2. comment
    Comment #46971220

    What value is there in tested code when you have the option of superlative, flawless code?

  3. comment
    Comment #46971196

    LLMs write superior code. Maybe they learned from humans, but they have seen further while standing on those shoulders.

  4. comment
    Comment #46971134

    If the LLM writes better code (and it will) then its code should be favored over a library.

  5. comment
    Comment #46970972

    Why would you not?

  6. comment
    Comment #46970740

    It doesn’t mess up. Not any more.

  7. comment
  8. comment
    Comment #46942690

    > Everyone can treat the project as a black box, and focus on observable changes to the project's behavior. This is a good thing. I don’t need to focus on oil refineries when I fil…

  9. comment
  10. story
  11. comment
    Comment #46929540

    Since the code does not matter , you wouldn’t need or want to phrase it in terms of algorithmic complexity. You surely would have a more real world requirement, like, if the data s…

  12. comment
    Comment #46928870

    If you have particular performance requirements like that, then include them. Test for them. You still don’t have to actually look at the code. Either the software meets expectatio…

  13. comment
    Comment #46928437

    And that is the right assumption. Why would any humans need (or even want) to look at code any more? That’s like saying you want to go manually inspect the oil refinery every time …

  14. comment
    Comment #46928270

    The code itself does not matter. If the tests pass, and the tests are good, then who cares? AI will be maintaining the code.

  15. comment
    Comment #46926215

    Nobody is saying to skip testing the software. Testing is still important. What the code itself looks like, isn’t.

  16. comment
    Comment #46924938

    And there was a time when using libraries and frameworks was the right thing to do, for that very reason. But LLMs have the equivalent of way more experience than any single progra…

  17. comment
    Comment #46923897

    I don’t understand the interest in “quality code.” I never need to look at the code itself. I just make sure it runs right.

  18. comment
    Comment #46923820

    Which LLM works best for Racket?

  19. comment
    Comment #46749398

    Why build software slower than possible? Do you just enjoy wasting people’s time?

  20. comment
  21. comment
    Comment #46701005

    Yes, but it would be bored.

  22. comment
    Comment #46676026

    Why do you think vibe code isn’t good enough for real products? Just so long as you have tests that show it functions as expected, why does it matter?

  23. comment
    Comment #46584139

    I thought it seemed like an especially good read!

  24. comment
    Comment #46561662

    Excellent! Humans can then spend their time on other activities, rather than get bogged down in the mundane.

  25. comment