Viewing profile — fcvarela
fcvarela
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Feb 16, 2015, 1:22 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 37
- Public activity
- 9 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About fcvarela
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #39306597
ID.5 listed as least depreciating. Mine was 55k new less than a year ago and it’s worth 30k. Definitely not the 10% mentioned in the article.
-
comment
Comment #23509168
This is like saying 'yes' exists in all languages because there's an equivalent in every language... It's... a bit clikbaity
-
comment
Comment #21517116
Nice article, may I ask what tools you used to produce the illustrations?
-
comment
Comment #21257272
FWIW i've just verified this on a DS1019+ running the latest DSM. My certificate disappeared after rebooting and the default synology one (which I had deleted) reappeared.
-
story
Synology replacing user certificates with their own revoked one
Looks like Synology devices are replacing valid certificates installed by users with their own revoked 'synology.com' one after each reboot. If you have HSTS enabled, the only way …
-
comment
Comment #19197175
As frustrated with Apple as the next person, but I have never experienced this using a bunch of interfaces and devices with their own clock source...
-
comment
Comment #13867504
The spec doesn't govern what applications can and cannot accept, it governs what contents are valid in tokens. 'None' is valid, that means my parser library will accept it, it does…
-
comment
Comment #13866132
I don't think the spec meant to read that you must allow the client to be able to forge tokens by accepting tokens issued by it without an algo or signature. If you issue tokens wi…
-
comment
Comment #13865991
"Send a header that specifies the "none" algorithm be used" Why would an issuer ever let a client decide what algo to use? "Send a header that specifies the "HS256" algorithm when …