Viewing profile — falseprofit
falseprofit
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jun 05, 2020, 9:01 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 149
- Public activity
- 136 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About falseprofit
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48905175
The wear on the pieces and board was not an input for the AI tool they used. Also, they didn’t “ask” an AI anything, as it was not a natural language AI tool.
-
comment
Comment #48697858
Maybe it isn’t changing mass at all, and what’s changing is just the probability distribution resulting from a hypothetical flavor measurement. If we could measure the mass (collap…
-
comment
Comment #48681255
Not a physicist, but here are a couple Wikipedia excerpts I found: From page “Conservation of mass”: “In general, mass is not conserved. The conservation of mass is a law that hold…
-
comment
Comment #48095677
The contest has a cash prize. Why did you put the university name in quotes?
-
comment
Comment #48070342
Professor Simonton, quoted here, seems to be confused about what is meant by Shakespeare’s “problem plays”.
-
comment
Comment #47641418
Is this article just plagiarized from the Reuters one from the day before? https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/judge-now-dismisses...
-
comment
Comment #46766554
The U.S. itself has been engaging in similar behavior around the world for a long time. The specific relevance of Israel may only be a combination of recency and amount of U.S. att…
-
comment
Comment #46261218
Hey, do you mind sharing any of these other forums? I’m trying to make my way up the satire food chain.
-
comment
Comment #46188189
I would guess that was not a joke. The benefits could drop all the way to 0 at a reasonable point unless you impose the stronger condition that the function be analytic.
-
comment
Comment #45950023
I actually agree with your premise of ruling out “not at all”. I was just responding to your characterization of “if ever”. I’m not quite as certain as you are, though. Just becaus…
-
comment
Comment #45947694
Let’s say there are three options: {soon, later, not at all}. Ruling out only one to arrive at {later, not at all} implies less knowledge than ruling out two and asserting {later}.…
-
comment
Comment #45785573
Computing, they propose
-
comment
Comment #45785483
Not being forced to open a joint account either… In all seriousness, all the pushback against paternalism comes from people who still believe in free will.
-
comment
Comment #45467894
That’s the next guy’s job to pressure wash it off ;)
-
comment
Comment #45355131
Can you explain the correct interpretation? Asking for a friend.
-
comment
Comment #45325122
The phrasing was matter of fact. And there is nothing inherently wrong with reposting. Certain other websites have developed a culture opposed to it, but I have yet to see that her…
-
comment
Comment #44694076
It’s the first YouTube embed in the article.
-
comment
Comment #44614947
*preferred…
-
comment
Comment #44520691
*tenet
-
comment
Comment #44388966
Felt like the article ended before a thesis statement.
-
comment
Comment #44388948
One aspect worth pointing out is that ILS are transferring insurance risk outside of the insurance industry. Appetite has gone up and down but e.g. hedge funds would normally not b…
-
comment
Comment #44183765
If it isn’t, it should be. No one asks in a forum because they want to hear from an LLM.
-
comment
Comment #42552100
One thing that makes soft sciences softer is that it is inherently more difficult to achieve the same statistical significance, due to both higher underlying variances and logistic…
-
comment
Comment #42419235
Why not?
-
comment
Comment #42310274
I’m not sure the military is ignoring the constitution. Correct me if I’m wrong, but I believe they’re supposed to follow the president’s orders.