Viewing profile — falsedan

oh that makes sense. I thought the OP was suggesting running CI locally instead of a workflow on remote runners

a display of great wisdom, nice

top tip: make a repo in your org for pushing all these nonsense changes to, test out your workflows with a dummy package being published to the repo, work out all the weird edge ca…

> You can run all your CI locally if you can, you don't need CI. we can't (too slow, needs an audit trail)

I don't think you're responsible for anything more than your own comments. I added some context that contradicts your assumption that the increased fees were to cover hosting/stora…

> Having your commits refer ticket ID from system that no longer exists is royal PITA just rewrite the short links in your front-end to point to the migrated issues/PRs. write a re…

we don't need it. we need to run our CI jobs on resources we manage ourselves, and GitHub have started charging per-minute for it. apples and cannonballs

> If you think that's easy I think it's cheap to maintain. let me know how many devs you have, how many runs you do, and how many tests (by suite) you have, and I can do you up a q…

I'm seeing wonky webhook deliveries for Actions service events, like dropping them completely, while other webhooks work just fine. I struggle to see what else could be responsible…

no, I'd cut the monthly seat cost and grow my user base to include more low-volume devs but realistically, publishing a web page is practically free. you could be sending 100x as m…

https://github.com/suzuki-shunsuke/pinact

I don't want to shit on the Code to Cloud team but they act a lot like an internal infrastructure team when they're a product team with paying customers

I think you could learn a lot about the other use cases if you asked some genuine questions and listened with intent

it's not the runners, it's the orchestration service that's the problem been working to move all our workflows to self hosted, on demand ephemeral runners. was severely delayed to …

if you were paying me a monthly license fee for each developer working on your repos, I'd probably consider it

they charge you for artifacts and logs separately, already

> Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something. ? Or is it the snarky one, because I’m 100% genuine

look, I get that you're not used to being called out on being hopelessly wrong. rephrasing the statement to be an empty tautology so you can be right is a waste of both of our time…

Yeah, if government regulations loosened to allow easier access to riskier investments by inexperienced investors or predatory VCs, there would be a lot more stock-based renumerati…

uh HN is not the 'business' of YC. get back to work

> SE does not profit from its community websites I don’t see how it’s my problem that their business model isn’t profitable. The board & C-suite still draw a salary, and the compan…

amazing, how when even more people are involved with selecting and tagging the input, it becomes even less likely any one person was to blame.

Yeah. It's the custom serialisation & schema/ctor arg validation that makes it clunky.

> We have volunteer fire fighters, volunteer paramedics, volunteer librarians, volunteer social workers None of these positions are with a private business operating for profit.

Jeff seems to have a lot of trouble empathising with users, especially when they want something that clashes with whatever he has discovered is the 'right' solution. See blocklists…