Viewing profile — fabrice_d
fabrice_d
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Feb 27, 2012, 5:51 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 4,650
- Public activity
- 742 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About fabrice_d
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49244946
All models come with some bias. Given Meta's track record, I would not touch anything from them with a 10 feet pole.
-
comment
Comment #49132125
If you can, try again (don't forget to start with `./mach bootstrap` to install dependencies) and open an issue if the build fails. SpiderMonkey is shipped pre-compiled for most ar…
-
comment
Comment #48689086
A pure AOSP distribution is now lacking a lot of basic apps. Distributions like LineageOS or GrapheneOS fill the gap with their own, but pure AOSP is totally unusable.
-
comment
Comment #48603287
You can switch to the AppView from https://mu.social/ and you'll get editing working.
-
comment
Comment #48602581
> You can’t even accurately calculate things like post likes. And maybe that's a good thing.
-
comment
Comment #48262275
I don't believe this is a good solution: users will obviously click on that add-on install dialog box without being better informed and protected against malicious / buggy / attack…
-
comment
Comment #48156169
It has build.rs that will run as soon as you compile the dependency. That's not the same thing but pretty close to a post install script: it's very likely to run.
-
comment
Comment #47999064
It's very naive to believe the "no influence" part. I will never give to Ladybird given their closeness with fascists. Is that the kind of influence they expect?
-
comment
Comment #47999005
If you are interested in new browsers / web runtimes, Servo publishes binaries monthly: https://servo.org/download/
-
comment
Comment #47898343
Probably because they don't leverage cosmetic filtering yet: https://docs.rs/adblock/latest/adblock/struct.Engine.html#me...
- story
-
comment
Comment #47225427
I encourage you to read the short paragraph at https://www.w3.org/TR/html-design-principles/#priority-of-co...
-
comment
Comment #47130320
> Perhaps, but in fairness the project was started in 2018 when Rust was still new and unproven. Rust was already proven in 2018, and I'm pretty sure they went with C++ for other r…
-
comment
Comment #47124978
You can't compare the choices made to evolve a >20 years old codebase with a brand new one. Firefox also as Rust support for XPCOM components, so you can use and write them in Rust…
-
comment
Comment #47038637
Did you factor in the highest cost of life (including housing, healthcare, retirement, etc.) in the US in your 50% ?
-
comment
Comment #46800621
WhatsApp was using libsignal (the C version) when I worked on the KaiOS integration in 2017/2018.
-
comment
Comment #46787954
This is a cool project, and to render Simon's blog will likely become the #1 goal of AI produced "web browsers". But we're very far from a browser here, so that's not that impressi…
-
comment
Comment #46662266
Some people looked at some of the authors background: https://gameboat.bearblog.dev/the-resonant-computing-manifes... There are actually things to be very skeptical about.
-
comment
Comment #46582835
Some people are also opposed because of the negative externalities when building and running AI systems (environmental consequences, intellectual property theft), even if they unde…
-
comment
Comment #46019396
Mozilla Corp. has > $1B in the bank. Their pockets are not empty.
-
comment
Comment #45956180
The billion laughs attack has well known solutions (basically, don't recurse too deep). It's not a reason to not implement DOCTYPE support.
-
comment
Comment #45920152
> I can get the source of the kernel, including all drivers, running on my android phone with a few clicks and build a custom ROM. No, most drivers are closed source and you can ju…
-
comment
Comment #45861778
According to Mozilla's own data at https://data.firefox.com/dashboard/hardware Windows (7, 10 & 11) make up 84% of their user base.
-
comment
Comment #45860445
Most of Firefox user base has always been on Windows, not Linux. What OS do you think the "techies" that promoted Firefox to replace IE in the first place were running?
-
comment
Comment #45786934
Indeed, I did not see that!