Viewing profile — exAspArk
exAspArk
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Sep 14, 2016, 1:48 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 155
- Public activity
- 76 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About exAspArk
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
story
Show HN: Telio – AI agents for call/text support, built on sandboxed lakehouses
Hi HN – founder here. We built Telio to power AI agents for 24/7 call and text support. Voice calls and texts need fast access to context. Our approach: aggregate data from multipl…
- story
- story
- story
- comment
- story
-
story
Show HN: BemiDB – Open-source data warehouse with zero-ETL
Hi HN! We're Evgeny and Arjun, and we’re building a simpler way for startups to do data analytics. Since open-sourcing our Postgres read replica optimized for analytics ( https://g…
- story
-
comment
Comment #43556544
There are a few different approaches. The main categories, from simplest to most complex: 1) Read replicas with copied data. The most straightforward, allowing using the same SQL s…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #42881433
Hey HN! We’re Evgeny and Arjun. We’ve built a managed version of BemiDB that syncs with your existing PostgreSQL database and gives you fast analytical queries without heavy ETL pi…
- story
-
comment
Comment #42095296
Our plan is to make BemiDB work with dbt by leveraging the Postgres-compatibility (supported dbt adapters https://docs.getdbt.com/docs/trusted-adapters ). So it should be possible …
-
comment
Comment #42087341
This is a great DIY setup. We're hoping to compress this stack and simplify it down to a single binary
-
comment
Comment #42087287
Yes! BemiDB natively supports two storage layers, a local disk and S3 (we assumed that most people would choose this in production environments to simplify management). When I quer…
-
comment
Comment #42087175
Our initial approach was to implement periodic full table re-syncing. We're starting to work on CDC with logical replication for incremental syncing. Here is our roadmap https://gi…
-
comment
Comment #42087149
Sorry, we haven't benchmarked it against ClickHouse yet. Our initial point of reference was just Postgres
-
comment
Comment #42083940
We haven't tested this with 1TB Postgres databases yet, assuming that most companies operating at this scale already built analytics data pipelines :) I'm curious if you currently …
-
comment
Comment #42083887
Our initial approach is to do full table re-syncs periodically. Our next step is to enable incremental data syncing by supporting insert/update/delete according to the Iceberg spec…
-
comment
Comment #42083856
That's why our current approach is to build missing or not fully functional features ourselves to move fast. For example, DuckDB performs reads from Iceberg tables not according to…
-
comment
Comment #42083816
Great ideas! We'll keep this suggestion related to read/write separation in mind. We started with a simple unified solution, but we'll keep iterating, listening and addressing any …
-
comment
Comment #42083758
My few cents: - Compute and storage separation simplifies managing a system making compute "ephemeral" - Compute resources can be scaled separately without worrying about scaling s…
-
comment
Comment #42083661
I'd say that querying data from S3 is not ideal when low-latency queries are required. Generally, there could be a few roundtrip requests to fetch metadata (JSON, Avro) and data (P…
-
comment
Comment #42082088
Oh, interesting, thanks for sharing it!