Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — evolvingstuff

evolvingstuff

HN member
Joined
Wed, Oct 20, 2010, 1:08 AM UTC
HN karma
92
Public activity
38 items

About evolvingstuff

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48620168

    That's interesting. My brain does the same in terms of attempting to simulate that model of the people, but when it becomes impossible to run the algorithm (too large of a group), …

  2. comment
    Comment #44467404

    Very excellent point. One simple possibility I could imagine to mitigate this would be having an additional device/button one had to physically press in order for the thoughts to b…

  3. comment
    Comment #40378555

    From the study: "It should be remarked that, in the majority of the cases, people adopting plant-based diets are more prone to engage in healthy lifestyles that include regular phy…

  4. comment
    Comment #40043477

    You are correct, that is an error in an otherwise great video. The k+1 token is not merely a function of the kth vector, but rather all prior vectors (combined using attention). Th…

  5. comment
    Comment #39435247

    I suspect in the near future there will be a number of cases where individuals will intentionally release a bunch of AI "chaff", in the sense that having a very large number of bad…

  6. comment
    Comment #37742520

    I love Nomnoml. I have lately been using it to visualize hierarchical tag structures in a browser-based PKM project I am working on. I find it creates fairly clean layouts. Example…

  7. comment
    Comment #37580748

    Why would RWKV have a particular advantage in this context? (I may be missing some key intuitions)

  8. comment
    Comment #35101648

    You have been shamelessly self-promoting your Hopf algebra/deep learning research on a very large percentage of posts I have seen on HN lately, to the degree that I actually felt t…

  9. comment
    Comment #33330404

    Easy. Have a setting where someone can consent to (or not) receiving images that may potentially have nudity in them.

  10. comment
    Comment #33266394

    I have found the books System Design Interview (volumes 1 and 2), to be really nice and informative reading material on this topic.

  11. comment
    Comment #32693954

    Maybe I'm missing something obvious, but this seems like a way to calculate a mode, not a median.

  12. comment
    Comment #32671728

    So I just googled "differentiable Monte Carlo" and it looks like that concept has so far only been applied to ray tracing, but I would be shocked if that (or similar) doesn't becom…

  13. comment
    Comment #32141533

    Thank you!

  14. comment
    Comment #32132205

    Completely agree! Plus, less trivially, there can be a bunch of different link weight settings (for an assumed distribution of inputs) that result in nearly-symmetric behaviors, an…

  15. comment
    Comment #32131983

    Here are some "animated" loss landscapes I made quite a long time ago: http://evolvingstuff.blogspot.com/2011/02/animated-fractal-f... These are related to recurrent neural network…

  16. comment
    Comment #32130522

    May have looked it up.

  17. comment
    Comment #32016203

    Back in the early 2000's (when I first started getting into this stuff), Schmidhuber's ideas were absolutely off-the-charts revolutionary compared to anything any other lab was doi…

  18. comment
    Comment #4374301

    If I remember correctly, a big advantage of particle filters over Kalman filters is that the particle filters can model complex, multi-modal distributions, whereas the Kalman filte…

  19. comment
  20. comment
    Comment #4150363

    I am acquainted with a person working on this: http://code.google.com/p/openworm/

  21. comment
    Comment #3996410

    Another fun fact about high-dimensional spaces: Randomly pick k points in an n-dimensional space. Now, find their average location. As the number of dimensions increases, it become…

  22. comment
    Comment #3577461

    Agreed. To elaborate: Saccades to an unexpected stimulus normally take about 200 milliseconds (ms) to initiate, and then last from about 20–200 ms, depending on their amplitude (20…

  23. comment
    Comment #3576865

    Only twice as unreasonable :)

  24. comment
    Comment #3576858

    One way the circumvent the need for 5000 teraflops mentioned in the article is to exploit the fact that our eye is only capable of seeing a relatively small area in great detail at…

  25. comment