Viewing profile — evdubs
evdubs
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Aug 10, 2017, 11:42 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 589
- Public activity
- 198 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About evdubs
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48988199
It has worked flawlessly for me on Linux.
-
comment
Comment #48766610
Laborer rebels against capitalist system by directly enjoying the fruits of his own labor.
-
comment
Comment #48755464
You don't need to use an online service to do this; you get to avoid spending money on tokens doing it offline. Gemma 4 works perfectly well offline on limited hardware (I have an …
-
comment
Comment #48667166
> It's not better than `[1, 2, 3]` is it? If you want to change your vector to a linked list, in Lisp, you can change from `(vector 1 2 3)` to `(list 1 2 3)`. If you have some arra…
-
comment
Comment #48664283
> `(== a b)` is clearly worse than `a == b` It's clearly worse just because it moved from infix to prefix and is wrapped by parens? Is `(* (+ a b) (+ c d))` clearly worse than `(a …
-
comment
Comment #48596079
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #48574354
I hope 99% of that was documentation and testing.
-
comment
Comment #48532385
I am pretty sure Racket's `stream` will handle this use case. https://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/streams.html
-
comment
Comment #48530234
Threading macros are nice, though, right? https://docs.racket-lang.org/threading/introduction.html
-
comment
Comment #48507481
The cool thing about Dolt is that you [eventually] get the features of the databases (MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, MongoDB) they emulate, so you can have your PG 19 temporality featu…
-
comment
Comment #48507383
> Recently, a new type of question has entered the database arena: what did this data look like last Tuesday? This question has been answerable in Dolt for years now.
-
comment
Comment #48417445
I tried to see if an LLM service provider could rewrite some legal docs where nothing was hallucinated in order to follow a consistent format to see what may be missing in the docu…
-
comment
Comment #48395524
> I would emphasize the importance of batching and set operations. Please, preach your gospel more loudly and frequently. It always feels like people complain about RDBMSs being sl…
-
comment
Comment #48372787
S-expressions. Defining data in JSON or XML is way worse than S-expressions.
-
comment
Comment #48367279
How much faster? How much cleaner? What tasks are you accomplishing?
-
comment
Comment #48333080
Wow, what an apples and aliens comparison. You add a bunch of transaction delays to your postgresql case because you can access a database over a network, but you use transaction b…
-
comment
Comment #48327682
> What’s an example of a unionized vs non unionized group producing the same thing where unionized is better? Here's a layup: art. Remember the writer's union strike in 2007-2008? …
-
comment
Comment #48327645
Is it so difficult to say, "You're right. I'm wrong. There are actually unions for autoworkers in both China and Japan." ?
-
comment
Comment #48264615
If you're referring to C# (and Java) being the Kingdom of Nouns where a type like ArrayList is defined and contains its methods, sure, Lisp is not exactly like that, but I feel lik…
-
comment
Comment #48262845
Assuming your comment applies to Common Lisp as well, if Scheme (and Lisp) truly was, "hard to read, unfit for most purposes and that even proficient coders never seem to fully gra…
-
comment
Comment #48262793
> types don’t have their core functions associated with them concretely. They do in Racket? You look at the "List" documentation and you find all of the functions for lists. Likewi…
-
comment
Comment #48196664
> Widespread supply chain attacks. This is a bad thing.
-
comment
Comment #48144631
What's the likelihood that universities eventually become open model providers?
-
comment
Comment #48127427
> would be the worst geopolitical move of the century From a political perspective, perhaps. > doing it forcefully just isn't something China would realistically do From a military…
-
comment
Comment #48068368
Their valuation is crazy. Trading at $260, with no profit, their price:sales ratio was 36x (extremely high). Now, trading at $195, their price:forward earnings ratio is 130x (extre…