Viewing profile — eugenekolo
eugenekolo
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Dec 29, 2014, 2:41 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,052
- Public activity
- 257 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About eugenekolo
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49197116
Surprised only 1/3 tbh.
-
comment
Comment #48542633
It really is an absolute massive jump. Have no clue what's going on in the back to warrant a 3x increase... 25-50%, sure.. but 3x is wild.
-
comment
Comment #48153167
WOuldn't proof of that be some grounds for breach of fiduciary duty?
-
comment
Comment #47912626
Without SWE-Bench though, how will AI models properly game their results to show ~5-10% gain each iteration? Once a benchmark is known and there's billion of dollars on the line, o…
-
comment
Comment #47863880
Generally I agree with the sentiment, for one major reason: debugability/dev loops. Inevitably you're going to end up having to debug that each of those steps is correct, for that …
-
comment
Comment #47732910
..again?
-
comment
Comment #47454525
I'm not sure Bitcoin won.. it just continues being a ponzi scheme that you can make money in. You can also accept that certain things and be happy in life either way. Don't need to…
-
comment
Comment #47429488
No, because Lockdown Mode disabled JIT which is a part of this exploit chain.
-
comment
Comment #47428077
Unrelated bug as far as I can tell.
-
comment
Comment #47428064
I suspect you'll see one with this or Coruna soon enough.
-
comment
Comment #47427192
It's actually a fascinating find by Lookout, iVerify, and Google. This is a multi million dollar exploit chain sold to various buyers. Complete full chain 1-click exploit from Safa…
-
comment
Comment #47299015
Donated. Thank you and everyone else on the PyPy team. I use PyPy regularly on an app of mine, and very often when I need to do some compute heavy load. Typically over 5x faster th…
-
comment
Comment #46975296
But is it running ShellExecute on URIs?
-
comment
Comment #46143491
June 5, 2025
-
comment
Comment #45773979
I disagree you'd find "obvious" non-generic names easily. After all, "naming" is one of the hardest things in computer science.
-
comment
Comment #44800143
I think paying for search is becoming more acceptable when you look at the amount of people paying $20/mo for their AI subs, which to many people are just search engines. There wil…
-
comment
Comment #44739003
So you can detect if it's AI slop quickly.. but they might be catching on to this.
-
comment
Comment #44596429
It's possible they changed it from "thisisunsafe" to the b64 version to avoid automatic scanners finding "unsafe" keyword usage.
-
comment
Comment #44076729
Confused by his portrayal of Massena, NY. I don't live there and have never driven through, but looking on Google Maps it doesn't seem that bad or depressing as the author (and I g…
-
comment
Comment #43535994
It's definitely an attempt to compare models, and Gemini clearly won in the tests. But, I don't think the tests are particularly good or showcasing. It's generally an easy problem …
-
comment
Comment #43133152
They heavily compete on "privacy" and "security", so I wouldn't expect them to. Additionally, once you start rolling with one government, every one wants you to do something for th…
- story
-
comment
Comment #42781370
Can probably achieve the same level of deanonymization by just monitoring what times the user communicates most often. Or send them enough links that they'll click on.
-
comment
Comment #42684624
This was actually a really cool analysis. Fun to see how these things can be broken down so cleanly into graphs.
-
comment
Comment #41973880
What does the model say about this post?