Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — euclaise

euclaise

HN member
Joined
Tue, Apr 05, 2022, 8:44 PM UTC
HN karma
236
Public activity
78 items

About euclaise

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47169669

    Maybe RL? Just like similar corrections in reasoning traces. You can train non-'thinking' models the same way (though if you're naive about it then you might end up with responses …

  2. comment
    Comment #46670899

    There isn't, though you can run it over wasm on it. I tried it a while back with a port of the w2c2 transpiler ( https://github.com/euclaise/w2c9/ ), but something like wazero is a…

  3. comment
    Comment #45134710

    This is not exactly propaganda in the typical sense, but it clearly is the case that people successfully edit Wikipedia to further objectives. As an example, the Wikipedia page for…

  4. comment
    Comment #40347282

    Simpler than, but somewhat reminiscent of, Plan 9's windowing system https://man.cat-v.org/plan_9/4/rio

  5. comment
    Comment #40097475

    Between the official nvidia drivers and Linuxulator, FreeBSD can run CUDA applications, but it's a bit hacky No other BSDs can

  6. comment
    Comment #40058866

    This one does have attention, it's just chunked into segments of 4096

  7. comment
    Comment #40046350

    A lot of embedding models are built on top of T5's encoder, this offers a new option The modularity of the enc-dec approach is useful - you can insert additional models in between …

  8. comment
    Comment #39793851

    LM studio is closed source, so no

  9. comment
    Comment #39761977

    Neat. I've worked on some similar projects in the past I have previously ported w2c2 to Plan 9 here: https://github.com/euclaise/w2c9 It ran basic Rust code fine. I later managed t…

  10. comment
  11. comment
    Comment #37682196

    There's a new 7B version that was trained on more tokens, with longer context, and there's now a 14B version that competes with Llama 34B in some benchmarks.

  12. comment
    Comment #37682185

    https://www.reddit.com/r/LocalLLaMA/comments/16sw4na/qwen_is...

  13. comment
    Comment #37625893

    They actually have a performance edge, but they aren't well suited to chat models because you can't do caching of past states like with decoder-only models

  14. comment
    Comment #37440196

    That tweet had it backwards, more tokens in tokenizer means that the 16k token context window typically allows for even longer passages than if LLaMA were 16k

  15. comment
    Comment #37432654

    phi-1 is a code-specific base model, with further finetuning on top of that. This is a general language base model, not really comparable.

  16. comment
    Comment #37400712

    RWKV also uses some sort of L2-esque regularization, which was supposedly an idea taken from PaLM (although I can't find a source on this point, other than some message in the RWKV…

  17. comment
    Comment #37362683

    After skimming https://alexanderobenauer.com/articles/os/1/ - I think the items are more like objects than files. Files have a uniform I/O interface, while items seem like they can…

  18. comment
    Comment #37103724

    I like runpod, although I've found that I typically have to set NCCL_P2P_DISABLE=1

  19. comment
    Comment #36618127

    Training as GPT vs RNN will give you numerically identical results with RWKV, it's just two ways of computing the same thing. It's trained in GPT-mode because it's cheaper to train…

  20. comment
    Comment #36617375

    > The bitter lesson [1] is going to eventually come for all of these. Eventually we'll figure out how to machine-learn the heuristic rather than hard code it. Recurrent neural netw…

  21. comment
    Comment #36617358

    Important note: They only did experiments up to 32k length

  22. comment
    Comment #36497901

    Runit is way more minimal, the difference between them is extreme even on that alone

  23. comment
    Comment #36412094

    The only paper that I could find using an approach with fully separated experts like this is https://arxiv.org/pdf/2208.03306.pdf

  24. comment
    Comment #36298354

    Here, lobste.rs, mailing lists, and 4chan The other alternatives don't seem very viable

  25. comment
    Comment #36242630

    GPT-4 with Bing search ability, slightly lobotomized, but free