Viewing profile — ethelward
ethelward
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Mar 24, 2017, 12:48 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 649
- Public activity
- 186 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ethelward
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #28299637
Indeed, you're right.
-
comment
Comment #28295925
Fromthe mouth of CockraochDB's CTO: ‶So if we were starting at this point in time, I would take a hard look at Rust, and I imagine that we would pick it instead of C++.″
-
comment
Comment #28267738
I'd say that life at startups paying peanuts and expecting rockstars is considered slavery, not startup life in general.
-
comment
Comment #28260878
> However, modern HN just feels so deeply cynical, angry, and negative with much less of the entrepreneurial tech optimism of the older posts Isn't that a direct reflection of the …
-
comment
Comment #28256666
> When they say like a family they mean treating each other with kindness, friendship and compassion We have a word for that: politeness.
-
comment
Comment #28246743
At the same time, you can't expect Wiki editors to be expert in all cutting-edge domain of knowledge to be able to determine which academics are or aren't notable.
-
comment
Comment #28245725
> civilization ought to have collapsed several times over. Which it did, in some ways.
-
comment
Comment #28240291
Yeah, it has left the 4chan community and entered the mainstream quite some time ago; e.g. here ( https://old.reddit.com/r/virginvschad/ ), and it even has derivatives now ( https:…
-
comment
Comment #28220491
For an overwhelming majority of Zoom users, scaling over 1k users is not a concern.
-
comment
Comment #28214663
> Zoom was the very first to let people join meetings without a) signing up; and b) downloading anything E.g. BigBlueButton and Jitsi were doing it for much longer.
-
comment
Comment #23869333
That's ~4MB per thousand emails; while I agree it's conceptually wasteful, I doubt it would have any real consequences for anyone.
-
comment
Comment #23846146
I agree that these names are kind of meh, but they stand for things that will mostly be chosen on their technical merit, and that you don't have to sell to your friends/mom/gf/brot…
-
comment
Comment #23833841
> Any other reasons to go beyond 64 (or 80) bits? Algorithms stability. As precision decreases when magnitude rises, many tricks are used in sci. comp. to scale everything into ran…
-
comment
Comment #23815266
Because the academic ML community does not care about shipping product to end users not equipped in nVidia.
-
comment
Comment #23773732
Although AVX instructions, those are scalar. The SS pattern at the end is for Scalar Single-precision, so only one lane of the whole SIMD register is used.
-
comment
Comment #23731453
Thanks!
-
comment
Comment #23724496
> [1] Except empirical Bayes, which is a dark art. As a not-an-expert-in-stats, why would you say that? Is not empirical Bayes basically the same thing, but with priors stemming fr…
-
comment
Comment #23455343
> there are some minimum legal hours of seminars you have to attend True, but that's like a few dozens hours over 3+ years. > and classes you have to teach during your phd. Nope. M…
-
comment
Comment #23376418
> The RBF kernel nakes any dataset linearly separable, as long as the bandwidth is small enough That's very interesting, would you happen to have the paper proving that somewhere?
-
comment
Comment #23166640
BeamVM is much worse than the JVM in the raw computing performances department.
-
comment
Comment #23122925
> web-based And that's already not a decent concurrent for org-mode. Not that I have a grudge against web tech, but no self-hosting of my most personal data and no offline abilitie…
-
comment
Comment #23122885
> 80-bit precision is actively harmful How comes? Unexpected clipping when converting back and forth to 64bits?
-
comment
Comment #23051660
If I understand correctly: > we still make a small profit on low oil prices. and > when prices are low everybody expects to rise back to what we're used to again soon, because we'r…
-
comment
Comment #23047404
I don't understand what it has to do with reentrancy?
-
comment
Comment #23034843
Why would you want to port Phoenix? As long as the underlying VM follow the spec, Phoenix should be oblivious of on which it is running.