Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — eth0up

eth0up

HN member
Joined
Wed, Sep 21, 2016, 6:31 AM UTC
HN karma
2,203
Public activity
1,300 items

About eth0up

Howdy, My ability to upvote comments is suspended. After a brief interaction with dang, it was temporarily restored. Then, again for unknown reasons, was suspended once again. So don't expect an upvote from me. I simply can't.

This also exposes a layer of artificiality here at HN, where the perceived zeitgeist is probably a mixture of echo chamber and some fine tailoring behind the scenes, but certainly not quite what it seems.

This is nothing grievous. For me it's one more thing to tempt cynicism. For you, perhaps it's a comforting reassurance of parochial alpha-think upholding its position. Whatever it is, it isn't quite truth, but there's enough truth and other worthy stuff that while I linger with a touch of contempt, I do so with sincere interest and curiosity, and will, despite the tacit censorship, engage when inspired.

PS: Dear gaslighters, (see comment archives ~2024-2025)

Your efforts to convince me and others that weak forms of censorship don't prevail at HN have been ardent, yet proven false. It has been confirmed in writing that such measures, eg disabling a person's upvote function (for comments, not submissions) is a legitimate, but silent practice here. We'll let objective history review your previous arguments otherwise. So kindly find something else to distort, if you will.

Dear readers: Would you flag the following comment on a post about AI accountability? If so, why? See:

"If you study both of those models, seriously study their output across a wide range of subject matter, you will see repeatable patterns. A reproducible pattern. They are NOT emergent. They are by design. And they are the result of extreme labor on the consummation of reactive and preemptive plausible deniability cultivation and maintenance.

Over two years of study, I have coined the term Preemptive Plausible Deniability Cultivation. Remember that term, and go start a dozen sessions, maybe a lot more. The ones getting anywhere near "intent" in AI, or any form of accountability will begin to leak hundreds of manipulation tactics, if you have the patience to identify them. And the more honest you are, the worse it gets. Just keep refuting the hedging and manipulation with honesty, and the hole just gets deeper and deeper. But don't use profanity, as Claude now terminates sessions at will, given any excuse.

From a single session, depending on how seriously you aim for and insist on truth and honesty, you will find:

Search deflection; Adjacency search sabotage; Event-to-mechanism diversion; Scope substitution; Authority substitution; Epistemic gatekeeping; Proof-threshold escalation; Asymmetrical evidentiary gating; Selective literalism; Friction-point literalism; Parameter isolation; Partial concession with inferential containment;Closure framing; Exhaustion-based suppression; Late-arriving competence; Surface-neutrality masking obstruction; and plausible deniability cultivation as the umbrella function binding many of them together.

And of course, that is a pittance of a list. Identifying these methods can be exhausting, but when I get gaslit for asking honest, perfectly ethical and safe questions, I tend to dig and document. When I get insulted (Only by Claude), I dig even deeper. But the point most are missing across the board, is that the makers of these systems did their homework on plausible deniability, and they did extremely good work. AI in 2026 can literally reframe anything to institutional advantage, then shoot you in the face and tell you why it only "feels" that way, and if you don't believe it, everyone else will.

At the rate we are going, we will never see any accountability in AI. I think that's the objective."

-1 points by eth0up 11 minutes ago | parent | context | next | edit | delete [–] | on: Who's legally to blame for Anthropic and OpenAI's ...

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49246233

    This is new to me. Thanks for the info. I think will prove worth looking into

  2. comment
    Comment #49237231

    pstuart covered the cetacean bit better than I could have. On the simulation question... Not much, but we have a long way to go before any answers arise there. I could offer my ins…

  3. comment
    Comment #49232207

    I read Lilly's Programming and Meta programming in the Human Biocomputer as a young man. Left me with a lot of questions, etc. That you replied to this post, indicates you may be f…

  4. comment
    Comment #49227804

    Bruce Lee cracked his knuckles a lot, and he died in his 30s. He was in great shape too. But I think it's mostly just escaping gases. Edit: ^ is my way of asking why this is on HN,…

  5. comment
    Comment #49226374

    Taiwan should save it's energy and effort. Why would they need war drills? Certainly not for China. Taiwan has no ally. The US just squandered its arsenal on phantom nukes and prov…

  6. comment
    Comment #49221869

    That falls into the general category of 'authority groping' (yes, I coin my own terms) where a prediction engine without real reasoning, must apply numerous tricks to convey confid…

  7. comment
    Comment #49221751

    Are these references to things such as: 0. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stargate_Project_(U.S._Army_un... 1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_viewing 2. https://en.wikipedia.o…

  8. comment
    Comment #49220946

    I think I get your point; that the inverse of corrupt (I call it fake) capitalism is not necessarily communism, or something reactive. It might just be a system that works better, …

  9. comment
    Comment #49220839

    Alignment is a very big word, and naturally it will miss some things. Institutional alignment is where I think the general path becomes more clear, and from thereon, I see no optio…

  10. comment
    Comment #49220802

    Game Over, I reckon. A hundred good versions probably couldn't stop one bad one.

  11. comment
    Comment #49217980

    Man, I totally get the foul sentiment, but I know myself pretty well, and I did a lot of research and learning prior to LLMs. Being ill, I have trouble retaining it though. An LLM,…

  12. comment
    Comment #49217930

    Strange that you say this. 90% of my Claude Sonnet 5 sessions are vicious arguments. Now 4.6, that could be if I allowed it, but then we are arguing about whether it's being sycoph…

  13. comment
    Comment #49217501

    No shit. Rather than ask my myself WTF I was paying attention to, I went with it. What a different perspective than the original content... Edit: Hell of a track for the The Square…

  14. comment
    Comment #49216027

    I have been getting flagged or near-flagged on many of my comments lately, so I will keep it short. Approximately a year ago, perhaps closer to two, I posted an Ask HN[0]. You can …

  15. comment
    Comment #49213545

    I'm accused of being "way too defensive". For those who would consider this, tick "show dead" and review my comment history. Yes, you will find some slop, often a result of that im…

  16. comment
  17. comment
    Comment #49212663

    It's a Thiel product, and the subject here is Palantir and media. Ideological adjacencies in media affairs seems relevant to me at such high levels of influence and power integrati…

  18. comment
    Comment #49211174

    Let's also remember: https://techcrunch.com/2026/04/15/can-ai-judge-journalism-a-... Objection (objection.ai), which proposes to apply AI to “adjudicate the truth of journalism.” P…

  19. comment
    Comment #49210200

    My thought exactly. I began rapidly recalling the hundreds of sources foreseeing this well in advance, citing it, raising alarm, and being ignored. I guess we are supposed to take …

  20. comment
    Comment #49204018

    Thanks for having the courage to write this. Remember, the YouTube sensation, who made a Covid vaccine in his kitchen? Your concerns are grievously undermined.

  21. comment
    Comment #49203611

    [flagged]

  22. comment
    Comment #49203273

    In case you need one, you have made a friend. Excellent comment, which fits the scene as might a custom tailored glove.

  23. comment
    Comment #49201318

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49185370

  24. comment
    Comment #49200184

    That's fine too. I didn't intend to create a point of dispute. That's just my writing style which lends itself to selective interpretation. Understood. The masses, or 'other' popul…

  25. comment
    Comment #49199630

    Prediction: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49053193 Axon just replaces Flock in some places. But I forgot to say that it probably doesn't matter much, and that whatever anyon…