Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — eslaught

eslaught

HN member
Joined
Thu, May 19, 2011, 12:56 AM UTC
HN karma
5,130
Public activity
937 items

About eslaught

Staff Scientist, Computer Science Research Department, SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.

Research interests: programming languages, compilers and runtimes; parallel, distributed and high-performance computing. Feel free to contact me (see about page below) if you have interesting problems to talk about.

https://elliottslaughter.com/

Contact: https://elliottslaughter.com/about/

[ my public key: https://keybase.io/slaughter; my proof: https://keybase.io/slaughter/sigs/pfzdOL11OUYKphzUo2UqlDmZz37F1iYPq7omhhQtgjM ]

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48779332

    If AI works the way you suggest then we've literally been here before and we know exactly how this goes. When tractors came along, farmers became dramatically more productive. Were…

  2. comment
    Comment #48778253

    In what sense is AI like paying for ads? In one case you legitimately lose to the competition if you stop (prisoner's dilemma). In other case, whether and how much you lose depends…

  3. comment
    Comment #48703221

    Or, you know, just use a service intended for this purpose: https://timestamp.stanford.edu/

  4. comment
    Comment #48226443

    And how do you get this to work exactly? I keep getting variations of "Missing required parameter: redirect_uri" in the OAuth flow. The solutions proposed by Gemini and Google's AI…

  5. comment
  6. comment
    Comment #47714062

    Just popping in here because people seem to be surprised by > I build on the exact hardware I intend to deploy my software to and ship it to another machine with the same specs as …

  7. comment
    Comment #47631179

    Post is new but the original PDF is from 2025: Previous discussion: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42959775

  8. story
  9. comment
    Comment #47470541

    Please don't take up space in the comment section with accusations. You can report this at the email below and the mods will look at it: > Please don't post insinuations about astr…

  10. comment
    Comment #47470509

    Without an empirical methodology it's hard to know how true this is. There are known and well-documented human biases (e.g., placebo effect) that could easily be involved here. And…

  11. comment
    Comment #47414976

    I agree with your points. Answering your one question for posterity: > Also how were the data races significant if nobody noticed them for a decade ? They only replicated in our CI…

  12. comment
    Comment #47379830

    > it is a career-ending failure It depends highly on the field. In history, sure. The point of getting a history PhD is to become a history professor, and you can't do that if you …

  13. comment
    Comment #47367548

    I have an old account, you can read my history of comments and see if my style has changed. No need to take my word for it.

  14. comment
    Comment #47367536

    Iteration is inherent to how computers work. There's nothing new or interesting about this. The question is who prunes the space of possible answers. If the LLM spews things at you…

  15. comment
    Comment #47361286

    For context I've been an AI skeptic and am trying as hard as I can to continue to be. I honestly think we've moved the goalposts. I'm saying this because, for the longest time, I t…

  16. comment
    Comment #47361206

    It's not just about the increase in volume, it's about the delta between the prompt and the generation. If the generation merely restates the prompt (possibly in prettier, cleaner …

  17. comment
    Comment #47311340

    Is there something like this, but without (or with minimal) spoilers?

  18. comment
    Comment #46928560

    It's that, but it's also that the incentives are misaligned. How many supposed "10x" coders actually produced unreadable code that no one else could maintain? But then the effort t…

  19. comment
    Comment #46819563

    Not the same industry but at least one literary agent does this: if you physically print and mail your book proposal, they will respond with a short but polite, physical rejection …

  20. comment
    Comment #46782884

    But this is exactly my point: if your "code" is different than your "pseudocode", something is wrong. There's a reason why people call Lisp "executable pseudocode", and it's becaus…

  21. comment
    Comment #46776232

    But this is what I don't get. Writing code is not that hard . If the act of physically typing my code out is a bottleneck to my process, I am doing something wrong . Either I've un…

  22. comment
    Comment #46684806

    Here's a paper from September 2025 that compares programs for (a) semantic equivalence (do they do the same thing) and (b) syntactic similarity (are the parse trees similar). LLMs …

  23. comment
    Comment #46408200

    If you drive in the FasTrak lanes without an account you pay the fee + $10 surcharge (for a first time violation), and it goes up on the second violation: https://www.bayareafastra…

  24. comment
    Comment #46291049

    The other answers are great, but let me just add that C++ cannot be parsed with conventional LL/LALR/LR parsers, because the syntax is ambiguous and requires disambiguation via typ…

  25. comment
    Comment #46236822

    The solution I've found is to make using the API a hard error with an explicitly temporary and obnoxiously-named workaround variable. WORKAROUND_URLLIB3_HEADER_DEPRECATION_THIS_IS_…