Viewing profile — eriktaubeneck
eriktaubeneck
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Apr 09, 2014, 7:15 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 6
- Public activity
- 9 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About eriktaubeneck
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #10324308
Thanks, I just realized that when I introduced the notation above, I just used I(f), but then when I used it below I wrote Im(f). I will clear that up.
-
comment
Comment #10324298
Great point, and I apologize for the confusion. The function should be C to C, with the added restriction of R to R.
-
comment
Comment #10324290
Did not intend to make any claims that Python libraries don't do this, but rather to explore the subject as a way to better understand the implementation and limits of floating poi…
-
comment
Comment #10324273
That's an interesting point I had not considered. My view (mostly from the math side, my shallow dive into physical systems was just from a PDE class in grad school) is from the vi…
- story
-
comment
Comment #7562593
This is what I originally had but I felt that the Python `while` was actually a bit more true to the way a C for loop is constructed (and `range` seems a very not C thing to do.) I…
-
comment
Comment #7562519
I like the solution, but I usually keep "The Zen of Python" in mind when writing 'Pythonic' code.
-
comment
Comment #7562497
I like this one. I don't know enough Haskell to have come up with it on my own (but I should!)
-
comment
Comment #7562488
While I wrote this with tongue in cheek, I also aimed to illuminate the power of Python's flexibility along with the inherent danger therein. I do admit the Javacious example was o…