Viewing profile — ericvolp12
ericvolp12
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Apr 28, 2019, 11:20 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 382
- Public activity
- 24 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ericvolp12
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #44705909
The article doesn't really do this justice, it's not really "opting to leave" it's that entire divisions inside the Science side of NASA have had their projects defunded and so all…
-
comment
Comment #44390064
The Y-axis in that graph is fucking hilarious
-
comment
Comment #44321295
> Make it easy to do the right thing and hard to do the wrong thing. This is basically the mantra of every platform team I've worked on. Your goal is to make the easy and obvious s…
- story
-
comment
Comment #43108664
This is probably what we'll end up with in the long-run. Things have been fast enough without it (aside from this issue) but there's a lot of low-hanging fruit for Timelines archit…
-
comment
Comment #42119519
Give Jetstream a try instead, it's all JSON for you already: websocat wss://jetstream2.us-west.bsky.network/subscribe
-
comment
Comment #41692039
Oh that's pretty neat. Did you just end up being okay with large partitions? I've been really afraid to let partition sizes grow beyond 100k rows even if the rows themselves are ti…
-
comment
Comment #41691992
Interesting, we've got to 5M+ reads/sec in realistic simulated benchmarks and ~2M reads/sec of real-world-throughput on our clusters that are <10 nodes (though really high density)…
-
comment
Comment #41685003
Did you guys end up redesigning the partitioning scheme to fit within Scylla's recommended partition sizes? I assume the tombstone issue didn't disappear with a move to Scylla but …
-
comment
Comment #41684982
ScyllaDB scales horizontally on a shard-per-core architecture with a ballpark throughput of 12,500 Reads and 12,500 Writes per second per shard. If you're running Scylla across a t…
-
comment
Comment #41684959
The funny part is ScyllaDB still uses tombstones for deletions, though they do have configurable compaction strategies and iirc Discord uses Scylla's Incremental Compaction Strateg…
-
comment
Comment #41640369
Yeah exactly! The longer we can make it without having to shard the firehose, the better. It's a lot less complex to consume as a single stream.
-
comment
Comment #41640209
The current relay firehose has more than 250 subscribers. It's served more than 8.5Gbps in real-world peak traffic sustained for ~12 hours a day. That being said, Jetstream is a lo…
-
comment
Comment #41639482
Yes the actual record content on the network isn't huge at the moment but the firehose doesn't include blobs (images and videos) which take up significantly more space. Either way,…
-
comment
Comment #41639451
The 10x surge in traffic was us gaining 3.5M new users over the course of a week (growing the entire userbase by >33%) and all these users have been incredibly active on a daily ba…
-
comment
Comment #41638424
It's impossible to use the compressed version of the stream without using a client that has the baked-in ZSTD dictionary. This is a usability issue for folks using languages withou…
-
comment
Comment #41637899
Jetstream isn't an official change to the Protocol, it's an optimization I made for my own services that I realized a lot of other devs would appreciate. The major driving force be…
-
comment
Comment #41637849
The full Firehose provides two major verification features. First it includes a signature that can be validated letting you know the updates are signed by the repo owner. Second, b…
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #22904797
This was really well explained and interesting. Funnily enough I'm pretty sure this is a really similar method to urinal design, so if this whole basketball thing doesn't work out …
-
comment
Comment #21693681
Mullvad already supports linux wireguard clients if you want to just cut out the firefox middleman and use it internationally too - https://mullvad.net/en/download/#linux
-
comment
Comment #20782990
Obligatory - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7iSbrkeAhE (LTT Review) Take it however you want to, as a joke or as serious criticism.