Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — erichocean

erichocean

HN member
Joined
Mon, Sep 19, 2011, 9:54 AM UTC
HN karma
5,384
Public activity
3,111 items

About erichocean

CTO at Xy Group

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49217444

    It took 90 days earlier this year for our venture-backed business to get approved by Apple merely for a corporate developer account, with all documentation available at the beginni…

  2. comment
  3. comment
    Comment #49111527

    > I've been able to formally verify that the Rust behavior is identical to the Postgres C behavior for over 1000 of them. Since both Rust and C have LLVM IR intermediates, you coul…

  4. comment
    Comment #49105525

    That's because it has the best compaction of anyone, and it's not even close. Claude might as well not even do it in my experience.

  5. story
  6. comment
    Comment #49070400

    The article did nothing of the sort: https://x.com/dhh/status/2081435971678261344 However, even if it did, it is absurd for an AI to decide what it will and won't translate.

  7. comment
  8. comment
  9. comment
    Comment #48996864

    I mean if you're going to be that pedantic, then Clojure is "native" since all Clojure functions "compile to machine code" via the JVM's JIT.

  10. comment
    Comment #48991765

    https://github.com/cmuparlay/psac is extremely fast, I use it to recompute sculpting topology updates (think: Zbrush DynaMesh) at 60 fps.

  11. comment
    Comment #48991201

    Parallel Self-Adjusting Computation[0] is a fun entry in this genre. [0] https://github.com/cmuparlay/psac

  12. comment
    Comment #48952406

    You can directly call C++ as C++ , not via a C ABI.

  13. comment
    Comment #48952397

    Since Java 25/Project Panama, I have that kind of relationship with C from Clojure as well. Codex can one shot the bindings flawlessly, and the interface is significantly faster fo…

  14. comment
  15. story
  16. comment
    Comment #48882156

    Whatever the group owner picks, same as it's always been. No one cares about the actual choice, only that it is made.

  17. comment
    Comment #48867395

    I'm eagerly awaiting "AI 2100" from the same people.

  18. comment
    Comment #48867331

    > Are there examples of where we have collective decided not to pursue knowledge? Successfully? Studying human bio-diversity since WW2 is the most obvious example, though it hasn't…

  19. comment
    Comment #48853885

    > reviewing the testing/fuzzing process I've got insanely good at designing testing oracles over the last year for exactly this reason. I've ported some extremely finicky software …

  20. comment
    Comment #48853836

    I think the key is to get two LLMs looking at the same problem. I use Codex because it's better at the kind of code I need written (math-heavy, 3D geometry code). But if I was doin…

  21. comment
    Comment #48852087

    The arguments presented to a macro don't have to be valid code. Your "function evaluating functions" are all individually valid functions you've composed at runtime. (defmacro foo …

  22. comment
    Comment #48852031

    Here you go: https://www.marktarver.com/bipolar.html It's been discussed many times on HN.

  23. comment
    Comment #48851997

    > this just isn't the kind of professionalism needed for a serious project It hasn't stopped Rust's growth, so I doubt this is true. Most people don't care about this kind of inter…

  24. comment
    Comment #48849637

    I use Claude for planning, writing CRs, and code review. Codex writes all of the code, no exceptions. Works great, especially when you ask Claude to break up large CRs into roughly…

  25. comment
    Comment #48845520

    That's the approach I've taken with a bunch of legacy OpenCL code I've mechnically translated to Metal, worked great.