Viewing profile — erichocean
erichocean
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Sep 19, 2011, 9:54 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 5,384
- Public activity
- 3,111 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About erichocean
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49217444
It took 90 days earlier this year for our venture-backed business to get approved by Apple merely for a corporate developer account, with all documentation available at the beginni…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49111527
> I've been able to formally verify that the Rust behavior is identical to the Postgres C behavior for over 1000 of them. Since both Rust and C have LLVM IR intermediates, you coul…
-
comment
Comment #49105525
That's because it has the best compaction of anyone, and it's not even close. Claude might as well not even do it in my experience.
- story
-
comment
Comment #49070400
The article did nothing of the sort: https://x.com/dhh/status/2081435971678261344 However, even if it did, it is absurd for an AI to decide what it will and won't translate.
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48996864
I mean if you're going to be that pedantic, then Clojure is "native" since all Clojure functions "compile to machine code" via the JVM's JIT.
-
comment
Comment #48991765
https://github.com/cmuparlay/psac is extremely fast, I use it to recompute sculpting topology updates (think: Zbrush DynaMesh) at 60 fps.
-
comment
Comment #48991201
Parallel Self-Adjusting Computation[0] is a fun entry in this genre. [0] https://github.com/cmuparlay/psac
-
comment
Comment #48952406
You can directly call C++ as C++ , not via a C ABI.
-
comment
Comment #48952397
Since Java 25/Project Panama, I have that kind of relationship with C from Clojure as well. Codex can one shot the bindings flawlessly, and the interface is significantly faster fo…
- comment
- story
-
comment
Comment #48882156
Whatever the group owner picks, same as it's always been. No one cares about the actual choice, only that it is made.
-
comment
Comment #48867395
I'm eagerly awaiting "AI 2100" from the same people.
-
comment
Comment #48867331
> Are there examples of where we have collective decided not to pursue knowledge? Successfully? Studying human bio-diversity since WW2 is the most obvious example, though it hasn't…
-
comment
Comment #48853885
> reviewing the testing/fuzzing process I've got insanely good at designing testing oracles over the last year for exactly this reason. I've ported some extremely finicky software …
-
comment
Comment #48853836
I think the key is to get two LLMs looking at the same problem. I use Codex because it's better at the kind of code I need written (math-heavy, 3D geometry code). But if I was doin…
-
comment
Comment #48852087
The arguments presented to a macro don't have to be valid code. Your "function evaluating functions" are all individually valid functions you've composed at runtime. (defmacro foo …
-
comment
Comment #48852031
Here you go: https://www.marktarver.com/bipolar.html It's been discussed many times on HN.
-
comment
Comment #48851997
> this just isn't the kind of professionalism needed for a serious project It hasn't stopped Rust's growth, so I doubt this is true. Most people don't care about this kind of inter…
-
comment
Comment #48849637
I use Claude for planning, writing CRs, and code review. Codex writes all of the code, no exceptions. Works great, especially when you ask Claude to break up large CRs into roughly…
-
comment
Comment #48845520
That's the approach I've taken with a bunch of legacy OpenCL code I've mechnically translated to Metal, worked great.