Viewing profile — epr
epr
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Apr 09, 2018, 8:11 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 831
- Public activity
- 194 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About epr
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48271876
So are kids not going to have access to llms? Seems trivial to get around this from a technical standpoint for frontier llms no matter how this is implemented.
-
comment
Comment #47839753
Generally I think this is a legitemate issue, although: > the training process doesn't introduce anything novel This is not always the case. A compiler, linter, proof checker, test…
-
comment
Comment #47546329
To fix this I recently made myself a tiny tool I called jtree that recursively walks json, spitting out one line per leaf. Each line is the jq selector and leaf value separated by …
-
comment
Comment #47415955
I think there's a good one if you search around for "xv6 sh.c". Hard to tell immediately from a google search just now since there are many implementations (people do it in school)…
-
comment
Comment #45073643
When I was a beginner, A Gentle Introduction to Symbolic Computation worked for me. As the title suggests, it gently introduces concepts in a very beginner friendly manner, so even…
-
comment
Comment #44755419
These are all great. If you need to do something more involved, pexpect is also worth mentioning. It's a reimplementation of expect in python that's easy to be productive with quic…
-
comment
Comment #44688227
dwm and the community around it tend to use patches for absolutely everything, unlike most other projects. For most projects/codebases, maintaining patch sets is done for security,…
-
comment
Comment #44684755
I guess people downvoting this don't get the joke?
-
comment
Comment #44666095
Everything is an object in Python as well
-
comment
Comment #44458172
Human beings get by quite well with extremely oversimplified (low resolution) abstractions. There is no need whatsoever for something even approaching universal or perfect. Humans …
-
comment
Comment #44209776
Yes, but the main thing here is that ALL software development is now "profit" in the short term. In theory you've developed a capital good that benefits you over time, hence the am…
-
comment
Comment #44105781
My bad on that typo. I write "$@" so often in shell scripts that I should know better. Also would've been caught by shellcheck. Outside the hn edit window though, so my mistake is …
-
comment
Comment #44099022
I'm generally not a huge fan of inlining the command or cluttering up my local directory with little scripts to get around the fact that it must be a subprocess you can send a sign…
-
comment
Comment #44072526
A bit confusing for sure, but I think (not sure) I get what they're saying. Training a nn (for visual tasks at least) consists of training a model with much more dimensions (params…
-
comment
Comment #44071880
Actually no, it's not interesting at all. Vague dismissal of an outsider is a pretty standard response by insecure academic types. It could have been interesting and/or helpful to …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #43300165
> We studied 198 randomly sampled, real world fail- ures reported on five popular distributed data-analytic and storage systems, including HDFS, a distributed file system [27]; Had…
-
comment
Comment #43148901
The best answer to your question is some variant of "write more assembly". When someone indicates to me they want to learn programming for example, I ask them how many programs the…
-
comment
Comment #43148724
For what's written in assembly, lack of portability is a given. The only exceptions would presumably be high level entry points called to from C, etc. If you wanted to support mult…
-
comment
Comment #43059462
If someone doesn't understand "container", I'm supposed to expect them to understand all the namespaces and their uses, cgroups, and the nitty gritty of the wimpy security isolatio…
-
comment
Comment #43059426
> Having multiple processes under one user in an operating system is more akin to having multiple threads in one process than you think. Not than I think. I'm well aware of how "ta…
-
comment
Comment #43059377
If a container is "a process", then an entire linux/unix os (pid 1) is simply "a process"
-
comment
Comment #43055778
No, they are not. I'm not sure who started this whole container is just a process thing, but it's not a good analogy. Quite a lot of things you spin up containers for have multiple…
-
comment
Comment #42999695
https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.06347
-
comment
Comment #42988104
Do you really believe what you're saying, or are you just trying to "win" the argument? The nukes functioned as intended...