Viewing profile — enrico204
enrico204
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Sep 08, 2023, 8:29 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 50
- Public activity
- 13 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About enrico204
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #43425602
Actually, that is not a bad idea. @xena maybe Anubis v2 could make the client participate in some sort of SETI@HOME project, creating the biggest distributed cluster ever created :…
-
comment
Comment #41417366
Isn't that the MCAS warning? /s
-
comment
Comment #41356131
Yes, because there are specific exceptions in the GDPR that allow data processing and storage in many of these cases. However, managers are pissed off by the law, or just ignorant,…
- story
-
comment
Comment #40114041
Actually, my idea was to delay e-mails because I don't want to read them during weekends, while I still want to read other e-mails (e.g., newsletters, login alerts). I still open m…
- story
-
comment
Comment #37439720
Yes, it works on forwarded packets. In the example ruleset in the blog post, `em1` and `em2` are two network interfaces (victim and attacker, think them as LAN and WAN respectively…
-
comment
Comment #37439583
Fragmentation is a nightmare in a nightmare: we also discovered that IPv6 fragments reassembly (as implemented by major operating systems) is still plagued by the problem of overla…
-
comment
Comment #37439500
Actually, if the router supports RDNSS (DNS info in RA), SLAAC is sufficient for household users -- no need for DHCPv6.
-
comment
Comment #37439370
Author here. The ruleset in the blog post is correct. The rationale of the example ruleset is the following: we want to block TCP, UDP and ICMPv6 traffic from the attacker, while a…
-
comment
Comment #37439099
Author here. I confirm that OPNSense was vulnerable. It has been fixed in v23.7.1 (August 8, 2023): https://forum.opnsense.org/index.php?topic=35298.0 We haven't tested pfSense, bu…
-
comment
Comment #37439061
Ooops! Clearly a typo :-) I've fixed it, the cached version should expire shortly.
-
comment
Comment #37439048
Author here. No, OpenBSD's `pf` is not affected.