Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — enrico204

enrico204

HN member
Joined
Fri, Sep 08, 2023, 8:29 PM UTC
HN karma
50
Public activity
13 items

About enrico204

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #43425602

    Actually, that is not a bad idea. @xena maybe Anubis v2 could make the client participate in some sort of SETI@HOME project, creating the biggest distributed cluster ever created :…

  2. comment
    Comment #41417366

    Isn't that the MCAS warning? /s

  3. comment
    Comment #41356131

    Yes, because there are specific exceptions in the GDPR that allow data processing and storage in many of these cases. However, managers are pissed off by the law, or just ignorant,…

  4. story
  5. comment
    Comment #40114041

    Actually, my idea was to delay e-mails because I don't want to read them during weekends, while I still want to read other e-mails (e.g., newsletters, login alerts). I still open m…

  6. story
  7. comment
    Comment #37439720

    Yes, it works on forwarded packets. In the example ruleset in the blog post, `em1` and `em2` are two network interfaces (victim and attacker, think them as LAN and WAN respectively…

  8. comment
    Comment #37439583

    Fragmentation is a nightmare in a nightmare: we also discovered that IPv6 fragments reassembly (as implemented by major operating systems) is still plagued by the problem of overla…

  9. comment
    Comment #37439500

    Actually, if the router supports RDNSS (DNS info in RA), SLAAC is sufficient for household users -- no need for DHCPv6.

  10. comment
    Comment #37439370

    Author here. The ruleset in the blog post is correct. The rationale of the example ruleset is the following: we want to block TCP, UDP and ICMPv6 traffic from the attacker, while a…

  11. comment
    Comment #37439099

    Author here. I confirm that OPNSense was vulnerable. It has been fixed in v23.7.1 (August 8, 2023): https://forum.opnsense.org/index.php?topic=35298.0 We haven't tested pfSense, bu…

  12. comment
    Comment #37439061

    Ooops! Clearly a typo :-) I've fixed it, the cached version should expire shortly.

  13. comment
    Comment #37439048

    Author here. No, OpenBSD's `pf` is not affected.