Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — enord

enord

HN member
Joined
Thu, Mar 22, 2012, 3:55 PM UTC
HN karma
433
Public activity
204 items

About enord

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47282638

    This is due to utf-16, an unforgivable abomination.

  2. comment
    Comment #45561580

    Wait… are you betting on exponential or logarithmic returns?

  3. comment
    Comment #45317975

    [flagged]

  4. comment
    Comment #44415412

    Bad writing is perennial

  5. comment
    Comment #44296345

    It’s a real shame Dijkstra rubbed so many people the wrong way. Maybe his incisive polemic, which I greatly enjoy, was all but pandering to a certain elitist sensibility in the end…

  6. comment
    Comment #43004301

    These are all expository diagrams. Second-hand and auxiliary by nature. Diagrams can be authoritative, and the ones I’ve seen will break some or all of these rules because they rep…

  7. comment
    Comment #42101185

    Memoization is the word here. Can be done in different ways—- of which storing the stack frame is one.

  8. comment
    Comment #42011456

    Ah! That’s actually recursion again.

  9. comment
    Comment #41988724

    > In the aggregate, almost no programmer can think up code faster than they can type it in. And thank god! Code is a liability. The price of code is coming down but selling code is…

  10. comment
    Comment #41979682

    Yes indeed! Except you can also do no memoization, such as the goto statement!

  11. comment
    Comment #41976301

    I find the prevailing use of “recursion”, i.e. β-reduction all the way to ground terms, to be an impoverished sense of the term. By all means, you should be familiar with the evalu…

  12. comment
    Comment #40957178

    Ah yes, the taboo of sound reasoning.

  13. comment
    Comment #40919499

    These are very good questions that deserve unequivocal answers. Alas…

  14. comment
    Comment #40904958

    That’s neither here nor there. Everything can be statistically modelled but very few things are reasoning. Same with turing machines.

  15. comment
    Comment #40858280

    The killer feature isn’t even fully indexed queries for ever, it’s the serialization formats. Need to do a non-trivial merge of complex domain graphs? Why have you tried string con…

  16. comment
    Comment #40851380

    Most vendors use three indexes for triples and 4 or 6 for quads. All the indexes are covering, which is to say they triplicate all data—-in other words the database consists only o…

  17. comment
    Comment #39081919

    With the caveat that I was exactly wrong about the books de-listing, I feel you are making my point for me and retreating to a more pragmatic position about defaults. The (quite en…

  18. comment
    Comment #39081032

    Listen, most website and book-authors want to be indexed by google. It brings potential audience their way, so most don’t make use of their _right_ to be de-listed. For these model…

  19. comment
    Comment #39077899

    Well then I could have been much clearer because I meant something like the latter. An ML model can neither have nor be in breach of copyright so any discussion about how it works,…

  20. comment
    Comment #39074156

    What did I write to give you that impression?

  21. comment
    Comment #39074131

    Oh come on, you’re being insincere. Wether or not the model is learning from the work just like people is hotly debated as if it would make a difference . Fair use is even brought …

  22. comment
    Comment #39070921

    I’m completely flabbergasted by the number of comments implying copyright concepts such as “fair use” or “derivative work” apply to trained ML models. Copyright is for _people_, as…

  23. comment
  24. comment
    Comment #38396272

    If there is something new about EA it is, as a matter of public record, not the use of statistically rigorous cost-/benefit analysis. The hubris! Anyhow, I will admit that the (put…

  25. comment
    Comment #38383160

    I just really feel… you didn’t, like at all, read what I wrote, you know?