Viewing profile — engineercodex
engineercodex
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Sep 07, 2023, 7:25 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 243
- Public activity
- 29 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About engineercodex
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #40245236
We all know this isn’t replacing doctors. We do know that when applied correctly, this will assist doctors and other clinical specialists in their work. With doctor burnout at all …
-
comment
Comment #39518834
I could see that, and I wouldn't want LLMs just generating tests willy-nilly with no human oversight. I don't have any trust in the reasoning ability of LLMs at all. Rather, I pref…
-
comment
Comment #39518824
You're right. I've edited my wording to be more realistic about the value of the test. I believe you're right that the test is not an outlier in terms of value provided. Some of my…
-
comment
Comment #39518809
Good point! I used exponential to emphasize the nature of the value of a certain test compared to the rest of the generated tests, but you're right it's not the right word. I updat…
-
comment
Comment #39490178
Quality has to be backed my metrics or else it will never happen. PS. Big fan of this person’s recent blog posts. He’s been on a roll!
-
comment
Comment #39487706
I inserted these because I personally like reading related discussions and articles of topics at hand. Not sure how this is a negative :/
-
comment
Comment #39487699
Ouch - half of the article (the "Actionable Takeaways" section) was my own commentary. The summary was for those who didn't want to necessarily parse through the entire paper's PDF…
-
comment
Comment #39487683
Hey! Thanks for your comment - I'm the one who wrote this article. I wasn't trying to say that the paper authors talked about "unexpected edge cases" or "thinking outside the box."…
-
comment
Comment #38743600
This makes so much more sense now. Thanks for investigating
-
comment
Comment #38743512
I don’t really understand this comment. I didn’t “slap” any date on top of the article. 2 Oct 2023 is the date I published my article. (This is how blogs on the Internet work.) The…
-
comment
Comment #38743117
Correct. This is a retrospective of an artifact from the early 2010s. The architecture is much different now.
-
comment
Comment #38743114
I’m the writer of this. I linked to this presentation very clearly throughout the article as a source. This was an article meant to resurface learnings from something that happened…
-
comment
Comment #38688185
Try brilliant.org or swequiz.com Watch some YouTube videos or read some CS articles. If you have a project idea, break down the next steps into tiny actionable tasks and draw out h…
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #37892556
A lot more founders and employees are heavily diluted than you think. I always just assumed massive exits meant people were rich. But when I calculated out how much an exec would m…
-
comment
Comment #37829170
Really great idea! I built something similar for myself but this is looks much much nicer than mine :)
-
comment
Comment #37761569
You should do a Show HN!
- story
-
comment
Comment #37566986
While X hasn't been dying just yet, I think this would probably kill it. The value of X comes from both the creators and the free users and lurkers. If it's just full of creators a…
-
comment
Comment #37566969
Incremental improvements add up to big things over time.
-
comment
Comment #37566963
I barely use Bard, but I do use the Search Generative Experience and the Bard-in-Google Docs quite a lot. I find both quite useful as they integrate quite well into my daily workfl…
-
comment
Comment #37542144
Sorry you didn’t like it dude. If you have any constructive feedback, that’d be more helpful.
-
comment
Comment #37533051
Author here. Comments like this make my day, so thank you! I’m trying to find old software engineering gems and explain them as simply as possible, so I’m glad you found it simple …