Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — endorphone

endorphone

HN member
Joined
Fri, Jan 13, 2017, 9:11 PM UTC
HN karma
4,857
Public activity
1,122 items

About endorphone

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #22834233

    The CDC is currently saying that this virus has an R0 of 5.7. Couple that with the many cases of casual spread (e.g. people who have gotten it with people they have barely interact…

  2. comment
    Comment #22834134

    It's a two page summary. Note that this, and the accompanying press conference (with professional PR team) are it . That is the entirety of the details they have released.

  3. comment
    Comment #22834055

    "The guy is not known for junk science" Junk science can come from people not known for junk science. And in the end we rack it up to a technical fault (e.g. a test for coronavirus…

  4. comment
    Comment #22833943

    The CDC is now estimating the R0 at 5.7, which is really high, and seems much more likely given the extremely rapid spread in areas like NYC. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/26/7…

  5. comment
    Comment #22833679

    "According to the Heinsberg Study in Germany" This study and its conclusions have seen close to universal dismissal. It can't even demonstrate that it is actually detecting SARS-Co…

  6. comment
    Comment #22827844

    "with the added features of less control from the developers" Given that this is an additional option for developers, this is pretty tenuous logic. You seem to be arguing against d…

  7. comment
    Comment #22824739

    Fascinating. Thank you for sharing.

  8. comment
  9. comment
    Comment #22806479

    How do you mean? This Apple design looks very different from any that I can find attributed to "Prusa" (not sure if that's a person or a company, but the company put out 3D print d…

  10. comment
    Comment #22805578

    "How far are we going to be under projected death counts for Covid? A factor of 1000?" What do you think the projection was? The US has tragically seen 12,242 deaths (which is an u…

  11. comment
    Comment #22805399

    "I can’t imagine having my identity so wrapped in Trump losing the election that I would be hoping for hundreds of thousand dead and the failure of the American health care system"…

  12. comment
    Comment #22803618

    Germany is up to 1.76% now.

  13. comment
  14. comment
    Comment #22797752

    Wait, wasn't your "but orange man bad" classic twitter response good enough? Why'd you edit it? "When it was risky for him to do so." Trump just got a get out of jail free card and…

  15. comment
    Comment #22797728

    You claimed that there were countless videos of "MSNBC and CNN criticizing the travel ban on China because the virus wasn't any more dangerous than the flu." Which of course isn't …

  16. comment
    Comment #22796778

    but mainstream sources outside Fox News absolutely downplayed the seriousness of the virus and helped push the "it's not a big deal" perception that we are all now rowing against. …

  17. comment
    Comment #22796589

    This is no longer active, so please disregard Thanks!

  18. comment
    Comment #22796012

    This is the sort of false equivalency that leads to claims that they all lie, so it's okay if Fox egregiously lies. We see this on HN all the time where someone stomps their feet a…

  19. comment
    Comment #22795968

    "Is there any danger for them?" Fox news dumped Laura Ingraham and Trish Regan. Both were at the forefront of claiming it was all a hoax. Dr. Drew has gone on a reputation rehabili…

  20. comment
    Comment #22794990

    "They have no motive to supply false data, and lots of reasons to make it accurate." They are working with garbage data. They know this. They admit it. Then they rationalize that t…

  21. story
  22. comment
  23. comment
    Comment #22788928

    It was an incredibly damaging one-off that has killed children. Clearly the vast majority of their work is worlds better than that, but I was replying to the appeal to authority th…

  24. comment
    Comment #22786890

    "And remember -- The Lancet is one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world. They're not going to publish something "junk"." https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lancet_MMR_a…

  25. comment
    Comment #22786832

    This isn't a peer reviewed paper. It's an extremely brief summary piece based upon a complete absence of evidence and then suppositions. And to what the guy above said, the Lancet …