Viewing profile — endiangroup
endiangroup
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Sep 07, 2018, 4:12 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 111
- Public activity
- 65 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About endiangroup
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48155739
AD: You missed the part about CRDT's!
-
comment
Comment #48155645
AD: Big shout to our community member Defelo for maintaining those! Come join in!
-
comment
Comment #48155301
AD: Radicle is protocol driven, my hope as a contributor is it becomes infrastructure.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48150450
AD: Theres a project `artifact-cob` [^1] that enables some of the functionality you are looking for. You can host artifacts off-network and make 'releases' that point to them. [^1]…
-
comment
Comment #48150409
AD: We've just been discussing this! There's an open RIP [^1] that we will be supplying feedback for soon. [^1]: https://radicle.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/369876-RIPs/to...
-
comment
Comment #48148564
AD: We're definitely interested in hearing about the rough edges and opinions! Feel free to post on our Zulip [^1] if you haven't already :). [^1]: https://radicle.zulipchat.com/
-
comment
Comment #48148533
AD: Feel free to post on our Zulip [^1] about your experiences of agentic workflow if you haven't already! Some of the team are interested in developing the agentic workflow experi…
-
comment
Comment #48148504
AD: The website is currently being redesigned, I suspect we'll have it up in the next few weeks. No it doesn't currently support other VCS's but we have planned for that possibilit…
-
comment
Comment #46745871
AD: Those are fair points, feel free to jump on our [zulip]( https://radicle.zulipchat.com/#recent ) and start a discussion there!
-
comment
Comment #46745834
AD: Thanks for engaging in a constructive way! I agree trust is a hard problem when your coming from a problem solution framing. Trust is pretty abundant in our day-to-day lives if…
-
comment
Comment #46733924
AD: I have to clock off now, but I'll get back to this, I appreciate the well thought out response!
-
comment
Comment #46733870
AD: Feel free to take a stab at an alternative, we're an open source project and we accept and welcome discussions but patches more so! What would read better in your opinion?
-
comment
Comment #46733675
AD: I'll take a stab, but I am a new joiner! Each repository is governed by an identity document which is signed by a set of delegates, each delegate currently corresponds 1:1 to s…
-
comment
Comment #46733345
AD: We're looking ad introducing 'forgetting' as a feature, there may be a mutually beneficial way of signalling to permissive seeds when content is no longer relevant or stale or …
-
comment
Comment #46733324
AD: We're actively working on that issue right now, making the defaults safer. We're also discussing internally how to enable revocation of content at the network level. It won't b…
-
comment
Comment #46733297
AD: Whats holding you back from using it as your primary?
-
comment
Comment #46733287
AD: Thank you for your contribution! I also run a permissive seed node, vote by participation!
-
comment
Comment #46733194
AD: The prefix is my initials :) - my only HN account is a shared one with a co-op organisation I work through. I use AD to distinguish who's commenting... however my co-workers ha…
-
comment
Comment #46733121
AD: Pull requests are `patches` in radicle, when you clone a repository you create a git namespace for yourself from which you can edit to your hearts desire, you can then open pat…
-
comment
Comment #46733098
AD: You have control over what you seed, if you are a permissive node you accept all content on the network, but by default your local node will only seed what you instruct it too.…
-
comment
Comment #46732989
AD: Newly joined protocol dev here, feel free to ask questions!
-
comment
Comment #44238581
AD: Huh! I just wrote a utility cmd [1] this weekend to deal with restricting ssh keys to executing only commands that match a rule set via `ForceCommand` in `sshd_config` or `Comm…
-
comment
Comment #42795454
[AD] Oh wow! I've not found someone working on the same issue, I wrote a short paper on a method to identify remotely running software [1]. I'd love to get your opinion! [1] - http…
-
comment
Comment #42795419
[AD] I've wrote a short paper on this; Remote Software Identification -- Zero Trust Remote Software Verification [1] after reading a blog post by GUIX - and I've provide PoC code i…