Viewing profile — emptiestplace
emptiestplace
HN member- Joined
- Sat, May 25, 2024, 11:20 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 238
- Public activity
- 188 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About emptiestplace
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #42826969
I had to think about this for a minute because the abstraction levels idea is very appealing, but ultimately I think this comparison is specious and misses the core issue entirely.…
-
comment
Comment #42826784
Sorry, I was mistaken about having used LiteLLM - this is the one I was using: https://github.com/wangxj03/ai-cookbook.git , and you can see the hardcoded shit here: https://github…
-
comment
Comment #42820307
I think that's probably the shim I was referring to - it has hardcoded context length, but it is either implemented incorrectly, Anthropic ignores it, or maybe it's on openwebui to…
-
comment
Comment #42820281
Needs some usability testing - I suspect even five minutes of watching a non-technical user trying to use it would be very illuminating. UI is unintuitive throughout. Consider, one…
-
comment
Comment #42819882
LibreChat is probably the one you want to compare to - Claude is not supported by OpenWebUI, and the shim will cost you dearly in terms of tokens.
-
comment
Comment #42819876
There is very little I find more frustrating than software that could so easily be nice to use but isn't.
-
comment
Comment #42809644
To inspire more of the same.
-
comment
Comment #42791062
> We don’t need the military-industrial complex I hope you realize that part isn't going anywhere any time soon.
-
comment
Comment #42790333
> Not everything is an XY problem Pretty close, though.
-
comment
Comment #42790213
It's back, but the nice thing is it's 10x more complicated now!
-
comment
Comment #42733825
Season 3 is so great it easily eclipses the first two, despite my pretty strong nostalgia-bias. It's like the first two were just a warm-up - and we needed the 25 years just to pre…
-
comment
Comment #42731292
We've had failed projects since long before LLMs. I think there is a tendency for people to gloss over this (3.) regardless, but working with an LLM it tends to become obvious much…
-
comment
Comment #42706668
I love the questioning my sanity before I've completely opened my eyes part. It's like a jump start to my day.
-
comment
Comment #42705576
https://www.theverge.com/2025/1/9/24340238/apple-iphone-alar...
-
comment
Comment #42698542
> Consequently, for an LLM to predict the next word in a sentence generated by a human, it must model these processes. No.
-
comment
Comment #42686259
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #42671701
What could go wrong?
-
comment
Comment #42630554
> I believe everything Annie says here. How is this relevant?
-
comment
Comment #42611003
I think they removed it.
-
comment
Comment #42597421
I appreciate harm reduction but I think any such 'perfect' drug would lead to dehydration / starvation deaths, or at least a lot more people living on the streets.
-
comment
Comment #42574582
Excellent joke explanation!
-
comment
Comment #42562205
What a hilariously absurd statement. You might want to actually try it.
-
comment
Comment #42532539
This App Store review makes Mubi sound promising: "MUBI IS TERRIBLE! *---- 6y ago • Nick2866 MUBI is terrible there's no good action or horror films it's crazy because almost all o…
-
comment
Comment #42529630
The LLMs themselves aren't the fundamental concern; rather, they represent an unprecedented amplification of existing socioeconomic stratification mechanisms. They will likely acce…
-
comment
Comment #42529563
I keep saying this but nobody seems to really get it or care: LLMs are magic. This isn't at all like conventional software where someone plans for every possible path, or even soft…