Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — emih

emih

HN member
Joined
Sun, Sep 21, 2025, 4:20 PM UTC
HN karma
115
Public activity
22 items

About emih

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47580938

    I like the story in the article, but I think it tries to create some drama where there isn't any. I think it's great that a lot of work is done using proof assistants, because clea…

  2. comment
    Comment #47481300

    Mathematically it's quite pretty, and it gives you elegant partial application for free (at least if you want to partially apply the first N arguments).

  3. comment
    Comment #47478926

    I didn't know Standard ML, that's interesting. And yeah I think this is the way to go. For higher-order functions like map it feels too elegant not to write it in a curried style.

  4. comment
    Comment #47478679

    Those are nice examples, thanks. I was imagining you might achieve this optimization by inlining the function. So if you have getClosest(points, p) = findInTree(buildTree(points), …

  5. comment
    Comment #47478419

    That's a very good point, I never thought really about how this relates to the execution model & graph reduction and such. Do you have an example of a function where this can make …

  6. comment
    Comment #47478196

    Glad to hear the article did what I meant for it to do :) And yes, another comment mentioned that Scala supports this syntax!

  7. comment
    Comment #47478150

    It's not that serious :)

  8. comment
    Comment #47478073

    You can still do this though: let result = (barbalyze(c, d, $) . foobinade(a, b, $)) input Or if you prefer left-to-right: let result = input |> foobinade(a, b, $) |> barbalyze(c, …

  9. comment
    Comment #47477681

    Thanks for sharing, interesting to see that people writing functional languages also experience the same issues in practice. And they give some reasons I didn't think about.

  10. comment
    Comment #47477580

    That's a fair point, they are all isomorphic. The distinction is mostly semantic so you could say they are the same. But I thought it makes sense to emphasize that the former is a …

  11. story
  12. story
  13. comment
    Comment #47103986

    Machine learning is definitely enabling writing _proofs_ within a proof assistant, and I'm sure it will help to make formal verification more viable in the future. Where it cannot …

  14. comment
    Comment #46376711

    Graph coloring is NP-hard so it would be very difficult to replace it with an O(1) algorithm. If you mean graph coloring restricted to planar graphs, yes it can always be done with…

  15. comment
    Comment #46244518

    You can't just put words in the author's mouth. It's also not true at all. For instance, teaching in primary school is a field that is dominated by women where I live, and I (and I…

  16. comment
    Comment #45343625

    The Boost algorithm computes the vertex-biconnected components rather than the edge-biconnected components, which are two different but related concepts. Articulation points are al…

  17. comment
    Comment #45336179

    That one is intentional. Note: a tree edge (u, v) is a bridge if and only if low[v] is strictly greater than the entry time of u. Here 4 is the entry time of that node. (For conven…

  18. comment
    Comment #45335702

    Whoops, you got me. Fixed! At some point I relabeled the vertices to match the DFS order, but I must have forgotten to update this example.

  19. comment
    Comment #45332634

    I used to get annoyed by these kinds of questions, but honestly I love talking about things I'm passionate about anyway and I want to get more people interested in the subject. So,…

  20. comment
    Comment #45332183

    Basically you get a bunch of problems (ranging from "check if a number is prime" to complicated graph theoretical problems) and some time to figure them out and code a correct & ef…

  21. story
  22. story