Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — emboss

emboss

HN member
Joined
Sun, Nov 06, 2011, 2:34 PM UTC
HN karma
29
Public activity
18 items

About emboss

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #10012120

    General-purpose hash functions should be as efficient as possible. That's why they shouldn't be used for password hashing directly. There are special hash functions (slow, memory-i…

  2. story
  3. story
  4. story
  5. comment
    Comment #4924425

    Hmm, that's an interesting idea. Although I could imagine that this approach ultimately leads to something like Universal Hashing. For example, if the functions you would use in yo…

  6. comment
    Comment #4924413

    Thank you! I hope we (or others) can manage to break some more hashes to raise the awareness of this problem! See also this nice example for btrfs: http://crypto.junod.info/2012/12…

  7. story
  8. comment
    Comment #4891551

    If OpenSSL::Random isn't working (because OpenSSL is not installed for example) there is also SecureRandom in the stdlib. It tries to do the right thing in any situation: Use OpenS…

  9. comment
    Comment #4891521

    You're welcome - and thank you!

  10. story
  11. story
  12. comment
    Comment #4152494

    Implementations: C: https://github.com/floodyberry/siphash Go: https://github.com/dchest/siphash C: https://github.com/emboss/siphash-c Ruby: https://github.com/emboss/siphash-ruby…

  13. story
  14. comment
    Comment #3863652

    Since it was standardized by ITU, it's still used in newer telecom protocols, and it's pervasively used throughout higher level cryptography-related protocols/standards, CAdES is o…

  15. comment
    Comment #3830439

    I find their attitude worrying - how can something be overstated if it's essentially possible for anyone to take down servers as easy as that? It's possible, so it must be fixed, t…

  16. comment
    Comment #3830387

    Minor nitpicking: > unlike in Java, you can also call a class method on an instance It's possible in Java, too. It's just considered bad practice. Still, a very nice read!

  17. comment
    Comment #3810685

    Maybe the question is asked from the wrong perspective - it's not that designers of cryptographic hash functions ask themselves "Hmm, so how fast/slow do we want this thing to be?"…

  18. comment
    Comment #3727343

    While we agree on the fact that using either of the three can't be a bad thing, I'd like to give my opinion on why I favor PBKDF2 over bcrypt, and probably even over scrypt, althou…