Viewing profile — emboss
emboss
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Nov 06, 2011, 2:34 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 29
- Public activity
- 18 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About emboss
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #10012120
General-purpose hash functions should be as efficient as possible. That's why they shouldn't be used for password hashing directly. There are special hash functions (slow, memory-i…
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #4924425
Hmm, that's an interesting idea. Although I could imagine that this approach ultimately leads to something like Universal Hashing. For example, if the functions you would use in yo…
-
comment
Comment #4924413
Thank you! I hope we (or others) can manage to break some more hashes to raise the awareness of this problem! See also this nice example for btrfs: http://crypto.junod.info/2012/12…
- story
-
comment
Comment #4891551
If OpenSSL::Random isn't working (because OpenSSL is not installed for example) there is also SecureRandom in the stdlib. It tries to do the right thing in any situation: Use OpenS…
-
comment
Comment #4891521
You're welcome - and thank you!
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #4152494
Implementations: C: https://github.com/floodyberry/siphash Go: https://github.com/dchest/siphash C: https://github.com/emboss/siphash-c Ruby: https://github.com/emboss/siphash-ruby…
- story
-
comment
Comment #3863652
Since it was standardized by ITU, it's still used in newer telecom protocols, and it's pervasively used throughout higher level cryptography-related protocols/standards, CAdES is o…
-
comment
Comment #3830439
I find their attitude worrying - how can something be overstated if it's essentially possible for anyone to take down servers as easy as that? It's possible, so it must be fixed, t…
-
comment
Comment #3830387
Minor nitpicking: > unlike in Java, you can also call a class method on an instance It's possible in Java, too. It's just considered bad practice. Still, a very nice read!
-
comment
Comment #3810685
Maybe the question is asked from the wrong perspective - it's not that designers of cryptographic hash functions ask themselves "Hmm, so how fast/slow do we want this thing to be?"…
-
comment
Comment #3727343
While we agree on the fact that using either of the three can't be a bad thing, I'd like to give my opinion on why I favor PBKDF2 over bcrypt, and probably even over scrypt, althou…