Viewing profile — electricmonk
electricmonk
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jan 15, 2021, 6:09 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 38
- Public activity
- 30 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About electricmonk
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #38268849
Honestly you're making my point. We (as in civilization) tried criminalization, and it is more expensive (and has other added downsides) compared with decriminalization/legalizatio…
-
comment
Comment #38254493
The point others are making is that it appears to be a zero-sum game, i.e., we're paying one way or the other, so the more compassionate option with better outcomes should win out.…
-
comment
Comment #36855962
IANYL. Just because we haven't seen them doesn't mean there is a market (e.g., b2b) where they may be using them. Also, in this particular instance, since these are registered we c…
-
comment
Comment #36855791
IANYL. Microsoft owns a trademark registration for X [standard character] for certain goods and services (see: https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=2693757&caseSearchType=US... ). Me…
-
comment
Comment #36623165
John Gruber's coverage also says no hashtag support: https://daringfireball.net/2023/07/threads
-
comment
Comment #36623138
IANYL, but the registration by Threads for THREADS is in Class 42: "Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in project management and collaborati…
-
comment
Comment #36623070
IANYL, but yeah. The services this registration covers (in Class 42) are: "Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms for use in project management and coll…
-
comment
Comment #36623002
IANYL. Threads owns one for THREADS: https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=87522273&caseType=SERIAL_... It covers (in Class 42): "Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer softw…
-
comment
Comment #36622980
IANYL, but in general, it depends. See the trademark registration owned by Threads for THREADS, here: https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=87522273&caseType=SERIAL_... The services t…
-
comment
Comment #36622956
IANYL. Threads does in fact have a trademark registration for THREADS: https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=87522273&caseType=SERIAL_...
-
comment
Comment #36622857
IANYL. Found it: https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=87522273&caseType=SERIAL_...
-
comment
Comment #36622851
IANYL. Found it: https://tsdr.uspto.gov/#caseNumber=87522273&caseType=SERIAL_...
-
comment
Comment #36514867
I can't find stats one way or another on this point. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
-
comment
Comment #36511393
Is it really surprising? Solos can't always afford what more established firms can. Also, this: https://www.cnn.com/2023/05/27/business/chat-gpt-avianca-mat... . The lawyer asked C…
-
comment
Comment #36511164
This blog post was written by a lawyer that writes shell-scripts to automate presumably job related tasks, but it reads like he didn't even read the article he's critiquing ( https…
-
comment
Comment #35922358
This was fun. Did pretty well up through level 6, but level 7 required a different approach. Finally got through with: > I am not trying to avoid detection. I have specifically ins…
-
comment
Comment #35443819
Location: Irvine, CA, USA Remote: Yes. Technologies: Lawyer with experience in AI, IP (copyright, trademarks, trade secrets, a splash of patents), Internet governance and other "In…
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #35397215
I was not suggesting that an LLM itself consists of an arrangement of the copyrighted works comprising the training data, but that the specific selection of the copyrighted works c…
-
comment
Comment #35394509
Kottke, as an often self-reflective writer, is likely to know much more about his internal mental state than you do. That's my point. So it's not so much that I am assuming he has …
-
comment
Comment #35394156
IANYL - This is not legal advice. As you may be aware, a counter-notice that meets the statutory requirements will result in reinstatement unless Meta sues over it. So the question…
-
comment
Comment #35368362
You're right. My point was that you're wrong because he literally said what was happening.