Viewing profile — eeZah7Ux

> No one does that by hand after a certain size This is not true

Yes, having a good std library would be fine. It would really limit the proliferation of crates.

> the FDA allows levels 100x higher than what Europe considers safe I thought it was an exaggeration so I checked. It's actually even worse: EU is 0.2 ng/kg body weight and US is 5…

> process isolation, increased security no, that's sandboxing.

The reason is bribery.

Stay away from them.

> greater LGBTQ+ acceptance recently has led to people being more open with that side of themselves, rather than it being the result of environmental pollution That's a very weird …

This is plain false. Most production-grade distribution do extensive vetting of the packages, both in terms of code and legal. Additionally, distribution packages are tested by a s…

Then the problem is in the company and not in the license.

Hell no, I want stuff like OnCall packaged into Linux distribution. I need something stable and reliable and that receive security fixes. Maintaining tenths of binaries pulled from…

dagger.io: "Developed in the open by the creators of Docker" Hard pass.

> 3 major clouds offer "canned" k8s services ...until you need to debug something somewhere in the enormous stack.

Because Kubernetes automates away 4 jobs by creating the need for 5.

Poe's law intensifies.

> centralization and hierarchies are far more efficient Efficient at what? Dictatorships are efficient at maximizing centralization power (and therefore creating wars), not efficie…

Interesting! A lot of people wouldn't want to live in a feudal society but are OK with working in one. I guess it's all about inertia.

> Not really Citation needed. > was the premise of the comment to which I responded. It clearly wasn't.

In terms of complexity and security features a car is much closer to an airplane than a knife. It's very disingenuous to compare it to a knife.

...and even if most people here have heard of survivor bias and selection bias, they still ignore it.

No thanks. This approach violates the spirit of FLOSS by encouraging developers to focus on popularity rather than quality in order to make bank. It takes away the collective aspec…

[citation needed]

> “Stop the bugs, we need to stop putting bugs in.” > Focuses on Jira metrics, praises people for completing “lots of Jira tasks” This is not a problem of ignorance. It's a problem…

No thanks.

You are considering only anecdata from one person. Only in one country. And comparing software development only with stressful jobs. And if you still think that burnout is not a bi…

The first sentence is false and the second is whataboutism.