Viewing profile — edohyiez
edohyiez
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Feb 17, 2015, 5:02 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 48
- Public activity
- 13 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About edohyiez
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #9078528
Ah, That explains it. Thanks! And to semenko too.
-
comment
Comment #9078491
I find it a bit weird that it can MITM https://www.google.com/ on Chrome. I thought Chrome did CA-pinning for Google-domains.
-
comment
Comment #9068701
GTK indirectly depends on libpng, so that probably wasn't the best example ;) The thing is that Linux distributions traditionally don't make any difference between the OS and apps.…
-
comment
Comment #9066818
Can you really? With the external file chooser, the app has no access to user files before a file is picked, then has access to only this one particular file, and after it is close…
-
comment
Comment #9066791
This isn't about isolating users from each other, but isolating different applications running as the same user from each other. X11 (and Unix itself) was not designed to do this. …
-
comment
Comment #9065669
Yes, I want applications to be able to open files and to work together, but only if that's needed to achive what I want them to do. LibreOffice should be able to open (and read fro…
-
comment
Comment #9064884
And you're creating a strawman. rodgerd didn't say that the only two options were SysVinit and systemd, but that the loudest critics of systemd wanted to keep SysVinit. Whether tha…
-
comment
Comment #9064768
I actually don't want all desktop apps to be able to access all my data all the time. E.g. why should LibreOffice be able to access my browsing history, or Gimp be able to read the…
-
comment
Comment #9064199
The main argument against this kind of bundling (apart from higher disk usage) is about security updates of libraries. E.g. if many applications ship their own copy of OpenSSL and …
-
comment
Comment #9063650
> The average Linux desktop user has legitimate reasons they don't want to sandbox any given desktop app to this extent. Could you expand on that?
-
comment
Comment #9063482
Then the media player can read every DVD you put into your drive as long as its running. So you always have to close the media player before inserting a DVD containing private file…
-
comment
Comment #9063457
No. Why would it? The user can still grant full access to the machine to applications they trust (like they do now). In fact, the traditional Unix security model (root vs. regular …
-
comment
Comment #9063388
It's not about "not trusting the user", but about the user not having to trust the author of the application.