Viewing profile — edg5000
edg5000
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jul 30, 2022, 1:19 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 496
- Public activity
- 426 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About edg5000
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49219127
And youtube shorts. Highly addictive (from a reliable source).
-
comment
Comment #49219119
I bet a lot of time goes into scrolling reels, instagram, tiktok and youtube shorts. That's leisure, but not social. Of course you can send people messages and comment on things, b…
-
comment
Comment #49205615
Very interesting point you make! Before LLMs I had a theory that we cannot make something more intelligent/complex than us. LLMs are certainly more knowledgable, but maybe not more…
-
comment
Comment #49192242
My bank forces me to have an iOS/Android phone for online payments. So at best I'd have a cheap Android phone in a drawer in my house in case I need to make online payments. I'm su…
-
comment
Comment #49178080
If you had physicial access to the machine, you could disable that feature. It would take some work since it must be baked into binaries, but far easier than creating a new EUB mac…
-
comment
Comment #49141126
It probably did in China. In EU/US we don't benefit from these low prices for protectionist reasons.
-
comment
Comment #49141031
Yes, that's my read as well.
-
comment
Comment #49119020
Great analogy!
-
comment
Comment #49065163
If we compare OpenAI subscription prices vs. the cheapest inference providers on OpenRouter, than OpenAI must be losing money. Add the fraud to this and the question is what the fu…
-
comment
Comment #49054400
Can't they use GlobalFoundries, Intel or TSMC in addition to their own fabs?
-
comment
Comment #49044661
Over the last 1.5 years, they had a few failures with their auth system; two or three times auth failed for a few hours so I could not work. But otherwise they have been just fine.…
-
comment
Comment #49003831
I always let GPT 5.5/5.6 sol reach compatction. I'm only offered a 258K window, but I think once they release 1M to normal plan users, it will be usable across the whole 1M. At lea…
-
comment
Comment #48989152
I initially thought that getting agents to work for longer and in large groups was the future, but I'm increasingly thinking that, at least for engineering, just one thread makes m…
-
comment
Comment #48981040
I generally use: - Overbuilt: Designed to handle more of the same. Too strong. - Overengineered: Complexity not justified by the requirements. Sometimes overbuilding (e.g. using re…
-
comment
Comment #48969162
I could not disagree more. You must have used the better models by now. Even if you only lightly use them for a question from time to time, it must have become clear that these thi…
-
comment
Comment #48969121
With a coding plan, there is no need to use lower quality models right (GPT 5.6, Fable 5). Only with some kind of batch job (processing PDFs) I could imagine not having enough usag…
-
comment
Comment #48968121
Yes, but you could have an uncached dynamic tail, this would not kill the cache though. And you could still periodically kill the cache, still keeping the same prefix every N reque…
-
comment
Comment #48965032
It's a very interesting technology, so it leaves some shockwaves while it's impacting the world. Over time this will be absorbed and the insanity will die out, but it's quite trans…
-
comment
Comment #48964922
That makes sense.
-
comment
Comment #48964804
Yeah, good point. The simpler solution eventually wins. But I do think a GUI makes more sense though, that was the reason I went my own way, but I think you're right that keeping i…
-
comment
Comment #48929979
Great speeds. So a small model on a lot of slow ram is fast. Now I wonder how larger models run on that thing.
-
comment
Comment #48929949
I do about 10 google search queries for every 1 opus/gpt prompt. For google, I don't actually open pages anymore 9 out 10 times; I rely on the AI summary. It's fast and accurate; t…
-
comment
Comment #48929904
I ask it to propose revisions, which I then review and provide detailed feedback on. It then works, and afterwards I review. I always commit beforehand. This works well for me.
-
comment
Comment #48929892
I've experimented with completely novel tool call syntaxes combined with ordering and structuring the context differenly, and they seem to have a high tolerance for this stuff. But…
-
comment
Comment #48929838
I spent 6 months frantically working fulltime on a harness, and when it was finished, I just stopped using it and went back to Codex CLI. I've also stopped using all the fancy feat…