Viewing profile — ecks4ndr0s
ecks4ndr0s
HN member- Joined
- Sat, May 27, 2023, 7:25 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 206
- Public activity
- 28 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ecks4ndr0s
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #36658519
Top notch team, from the programmers to the animators to the voice actors to the composer of the soundtrack!
- story
-
comment
Comment #36658473
Amateurs obsess over languages as well. Java vs C++. Rust vs Go. This vs that. etc.
-
comment
Comment #36656158
Survival. No /s intended.
-
comment
Comment #36643390
They are still trying to formalize the industry afaik.
- story
-
comment
Comment #36631817
You're very welcome!
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #36606617
The more 0s you add the closer you get to how Apple prices its products I guess.
-
comment
Comment #36606559
Just like motorbike helmets?
- story
-
comment
Comment #36571708
Yep. You probably shouldn't write rocket software using Brainfuck or Java, but for entirely different(functionality) reasons.
-
comment
Comment #36571209
As many things as possible would have to be taken into account. Maybe a different mathematical formalization is necessary.
-
comment
Comment #36571074
typical CS-majors know that Java/C++ and Erlang are Turing equivalent.
-
comment
Comment #36564484
https://stanfordasl.github.io//aa274a/ (as the CS237A Principles of Robotic Autonomy I link seems to be broken)
-
comment
Comment #36564448
Agreed.
-
comment
Comment #36562788
"External groups have not been able to reproduce his results." The reproducibility crisis is going well. /s
-
comment
Comment #36562754
I am in no way affiliated to Stanford. I don't think you can take the courses for free, but you can sure as hell read through the slides for many of the courses. Cheers!
-
comment
Comment #36562624
Maybe trying to reverse engineer it using GNNs until they produce the same output(within some error margin) for various arbitrary inputs? Dunno.
- story
-
comment
Comment #36537429
Yep.
-
comment
Comment #36537349
Same here.