Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — eatnumber1

eatnumber1

HN member
Joined
Wed, Mar 05, 2014, 5:17 PM UTC
HN karma
74
Public activity
22 items

About eatnumber1

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #44674875

    This is an old blog post I sat on for years because it's ultimately incomplete... but I still think it's interesting even incomplete, so here it is.

  2. story
  3. comment
    Comment #8091965

    Cool! Can you submit a pull request?

  4. comment
    Comment #8091962

    Can you submit a pull request saying as much in the same form as the Java solution?

  5. comment
    Comment #8091939

    Glad to hear it :) Can you submit a solution then?

  6. comment
    Comment #8091934

    The three people who are judging this had a long discussion over this case, and basically decided that since it is in the file, it's fine. We frown on it a little because it's basi…

  7. comment
    Comment #8091922

    This is a great incomplete solution. Can you submit a pull-request for it?

  8. comment
    Comment #8091896

    Definitely submit a pull-request if you figure out how to do it :)

  9. comment
    Comment #8091878

    This is awesome! Can you add a main method with an example of it working and submit a pull request?

  10. comment
    Comment #8091860

    Great! Can you submit a pull request?

  11. comment
    Comment #8091858

    Agreed. These are informal. If you want to make a formal proof that it's impossible, I'll make a new category.

  12. comment
    Comment #8091852

    Agreed! Please submit a solution!

  13. comment
    Comment #8091850

    Resetting the state isn't one of the rules ;) I'd make a solution which resets the state linked by the table though, so please submit one!

  14. comment
    Comment #8091848

    Can you submit a pull request saying as much in the same format as the Ruby one?

  15. comment
    Comment #8091845

    For the impossible bullets, they link to informal arguments as to why it's impossible. The ruby one has code - it's a syntax error.

  16. comment
    Comment #8091835

    Languages that don't use () still have to use the same syntax. See the haskell solution.

  17. story
  18. story
  19. comment
    Comment #7896521

    If the min macro would have worked, it would have allowed the two lines min(1, 2, out); return out; to be condensed into one line.

  20. story
  21. comment
    Comment #7348349

    It's SFW, no worries.

  22. comment