Viewing profile — eaim
eaim
HN member- Joined
- Thu, May 02, 2019, 3:40 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 31
- Public activity
- 21 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About eaim
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #20025361
Yes they certainly are.
-
comment
Comment #20025355
“Investigation takes time” They have been “investigating” for a decade. It’s simply spy vs spy & that's it. If that sounds skeptical, fine. Nothing wrong with with skepticism. It’s…
-
comment
Comment #19976042
Precisely!
-
comment
Comment #19976038
Well said!
- comment
-
comment
Comment #19976002
Haha! “Nobody can spy unless it’s us.” Touché! (Best uttered while spying on the world through a prism.)
- comment
-
comment
Comment #19975957
Their reputation notwithstanding, it makes little difference if all they are doing is taking notes or passing along statements, rather than digging & getting answers. That’s the fo…
-
comment
Comment #19975907
All is vagueness. It’s popular! Why bother with evidence when agencies / governments / media can simply make vague statements about threats & security? Oh & of course we can’t supp…
-
comment
Comment #19975875
Good commentary, well & clearly stated!
-
comment
Comment #19842717
Here’s an article from Rob Sheldon, who worked on ROSETTA. He is less timid than Ekeberg: https://uncommondescent.com/intelligent-design/rob-sheldon-t...
-
comment
Comment #19842552
Sorry but I’d have to disagree: There are plenty of people working on cosmologies that don’t include the Big Bang, or that do include it but only as one facet of a larger theoretic…
-
comment
Comment #19834330
All said and done, the current state of cosmology (whether one falls in with mainstream theories or not) is a mess. It has so many addendums, codicils & caveats that one has to be …
-
comment
Comment #19834288
Yes! Thanks for this
-
comment
Comment #19813053
If the Bullet Cluster had offered not hypothetical but empirical, incontrovertible evidence for Dark Matter, at this juncture we wouldn’t even be calling it Dark Matter anymore.
-
comment
Comment #19812974
Sorry but that’s an intellectual dodge. A verbal fiddle. Saying it is a “name for something” doesn’t make the fact that it’s a hypothesis disappear. One is simply positing the need…
-
comment
Comment #19807808
Yes.
-
comment
Comment #19807791
Ah, understood, thanks. Sorry about that.
-
comment
Comment #19804599
@astro123 The following excerpt is the crux of the author’s argument regarding DM, & it points to the dark elephant in the room that a lot of physicists are bothered by but don’t w…
-
comment
Comment #19804551
@astro123 Sorry my comment uploaded before I was done. It is an error to state that there is evidence for dark matter. There is no evidence for it other than that as a hypothesis i…
-
comment
Comment #19804476
@astro123 There’s a tautology in your critique. You’re attempting to suggest that there is evidence for dark matter. There isn’t. Dark matter is a theory, one that has not yet prod…