Viewing profile — dzik
dzik
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Mar 04, 2019, 9:15 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 65
- Public activity
- 11 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dzik
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #37031644
European language - there is no such thing so there is no need for such keyboard layout.
-
comment
Comment #33906874
My dad used to work as a "system programmer" in Poland, starting in late 70's. He has worked in a biggest (I think) government facility back then. He used to write IO code for a da…
-
comment
Comment #19313455
That's the thing. You can always hack something in C to prove there is a better way for a specific task. In the past I did things like that just for fun. But in the real world it d…
-
comment
Comment #19313080
Sorry, where do the authors claim they achieved >100k connections per second?
-
comment
Comment #19312823
It means CPU is not saturated, so it is not the bottleneck, which means it is likely not enough Erlang processes have been started.
-
comment
Comment #19312784
Point taken and I am already looking at stressgrid, "millions of users" is definitely a selling point to me. It is actually quite hard to generate enough and correct traffic to str…
-
comment
Comment #19312749
Would you mind sharing the details? (URL maybe) I think limiting factor might be not number of cores and outside of erl scope, that is eth card they used, network infrastructure, e…
-
comment
Comment #19312516
Did starting more acceptors than the number of cores make any difference?
-
comment
Comment #19312494
This article is quite good, especially part about bottleneck caused by single supervisor in ranch. However I have to say that title is a bit misleading because all of this has noth…
-
comment
Comment #19304288
There are 2 erlang books. "OTP in action" and "Learn you some Erlang". I highly recommend both of them.
-
comment
Comment #19300431
Erlang. Same here. Reading first few pages of a book describing principles of OTP (processes, share-nothing, messages, etc) was mind blowing. Company I worked for at the time (and …