Viewing profile — dwohnitmok
dwohnitmok
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Aug 29, 2016, 5:33 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 5,095
- Public activity
- 1,430 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dwohnitmok
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49238007
Sure. I'm mainly curious who beepbooptheory is thinking of.
-
comment
Comment #49237904
> Everyday we see articles exactly like his by different people (or at least I do), but none attract the same kind of distinct attention. Who else does a detailed financial breakdo…
-
comment
Comment #49225317
> Nonsense. The "weights" in "models" refer to probabilities. No they don't. They refer to the weights used for weighted sums. The weights don't have to even between 0 and 1.
-
comment
Comment #49119142
> political commentary from someone No it depends on what they choose to answer. canyon289's account self-describes as Bayesian, a hallmark of rationalists, one of whose taglines i…
-
comment
Comment #49116503
[flagged]
-
comment
Comment #49089855
As a sibling comment points out you don't strictly need positional embeddings for decoder-only causal transformers. You definitely need it for non-causal ones (e.g. the encoder of …
-
comment
Comment #49082799
"All translations in this collection are © Scott Weisman. All rights reserved, except as granted by the license below." Does copyright actually belong to Scott Weisman if all the w…
-
comment
Comment #49073258
Vinge addresses this in the linked article. > Stan Ulam [28] paraphrased John von Neumann as saying: >> One conversation centered on the ever accelerating progress of technology an…
-
comment
Comment #49070020
Vinge also coined the term "the Singularity" ( https://accelerating.org/articles/comingtechsingularity ) what he describes as "an opaque wall across the future" once superhuman art…
-
comment
Comment #48972346
People do use textbooks like that all the time in the experimental setup tested (essentially an open book quiz). I agree there are important differences in how textbooks and LLMs a…
-
comment
Comment #48972275
This study is pretty bad. The comment ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48970182 ) on the other link with the direct PDF explains the problem well, which is that nothing here …
-
comment
Comment #48964124
Roughly speaking it is the difference between having a contractor go out and do some work and having that same contractor first come up with a plan to do some work, run that by you…
-
comment
Comment #48964087
> Moreover, it seems the prompt included the technique used to solve the problem: I don't believe this is true. The author sent techniques he used, but I don't believe any of those…
-
comment
Comment #48958653
The author also used GPT-5.6 to write the prompt. This did involve giving GPT-5.6 access to his previous work and a back and forth process (so definitely still used the author's ex…
-
comment
Comment #48864464
> This is not a remark about AI, but there's something funny about mathematics in that every novel result is broadly perceived as a big deal. This isn't true using the level of ori…
-
comment
Comment #48791302
Do you know what kind of compression ratios you get out of curiosity? Presumably it would be lower than this format (because this format is meant to be lossy not lossless) but very…
-
comment
Comment #48783414
Interesting comments by @gwern (and why this is interesting to me beyond just the stories themselves) > The most striking result of the contest for me is what I am calling “AI alle…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48447500
To be fair the article never says that the family who donated the land was the one who was suing.
-
comment
Comment #48447461
Since this seems to be a misapprehension by a couple of commentators I'll put this as a top-level comment. The family bringing the lawsuit is not the family that donated the land.
-
comment
Comment #48447344
My guess is standing. The family bringing the suit is not the family that donated the land.
-
comment
Comment #48358868
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #48310051
Nice!
-
comment
Comment #48309810
The current HN submission title ("AGI timelines shift with whichever lab is dominant") is very bad. It is neither the title of the article nor is it the thrust of the content. The …
-
comment
Comment #48080146
> I'm guessing (wildly) this was around 0.5M USD in compute time. That seems like an especially wild guess. If you take e.g. Opus 4.7 prices, and make the assumption that you are c…