Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — dureuill

dureuill

HN member
Joined
Sat, Jul 24, 2021, 2:43 PM UTC
HN karma
456
Public activity
190 items

About dureuill

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47771560

    Except their customer's data isn't actually theirs: OP requested their private data to be deleted from the system. So OP expressed a clear intent for their data not to be used by F…

  2. comment
    Comment #47012881

    To be clear I'm not saying that Pike's response is appropriate in a professional setting. "This project does not accept fully generated contributions, so this contribution is not r…

  3. comment
    Comment #46995546

    The project states a boundary clearly: code by LLMs not backed by a human is not accepted. The correct response when someone oversteps your stated boundaries is not debate. It is t…

  4. comment
    Comment #45147237

    > The commons are still as available as they ever were, That is false. As a direct consequence of LLMs: 1. The web is increasingly closed to automated scraping, and more marginally…

  5. comment
    Comment #43689963

    hello, I implemented hybrid search in Meilisearch. Whether it uses re-ranking or not depends on how you want to stretch the definition. Meilisearch does not use the rank of the doc…

  6. comment
    Comment #41300030

    > We aim to make Meilisearch updates seamless. Our vision includes avoiding dumps for non-major updates and reserving them only for significant version changes. We will implement a…

  7. comment
    Comment #41299814

    I agree the answer is no in the abstract, but it is not very useful in practice. Nobody writing Rust needs to cover this "basic use case" you're referring to, so it is the same as …

  8. comment
    Comment #41291059

    I'm not sure I understand the use case here. Are you asking if you can depend on two versions of the same crate, for a crate that exports a `#[no_mangle]` or `#[export_name]` funct…

  9. comment
    Comment #41168477

    Very disappointing read. Starts with an interesting claim "don't optimize for typing", but then it completely fails to prove it, and confuses itself in thinking that `auto` is an o…

  10. comment
    Comment #40960515

    Some good advice, some bad advice in here. This is necessarily going to be opinionated. > Provide a development container Generally unneeded. It is expected that a Rust project can…

  11. comment
    Comment #40804659

    > You are actually just arguing for the sake of arguing here. I'm very much not doing that. I'm just really tired of reading claims that "C++ is actually safe if you follow these v…

  12. comment
    Comment #40788188

    > no raw loops and not raw pointer access - Do these rules allow iterators? - Under the "no raw pointer" rule, how do you express view objects? For instance, is `std::string_view` …

  13. comment
    Comment #40773279

    > Ironically I see with your last point regarding golang that we are very different people ans thats fine. For me I would much rather lean back towards C if I can guarantee safety …

  14. comment
    Comment #40766693

    > Rust also has UB and you should still be runnig fuzzers and sanitizers on your rust code, that is true for C++. Safe Rust doesn't have UB[1], and safe Rust is what I review 99% o…

  15. comment
    Comment #40747379

    > There are many languages that fit this description I find that in practice not, especially if you further limit that to imperative languages. Note that I mentioned memory safe AN…

  16. comment
    Comment #40747325

    > As someone who has some large projects in C++ and co tribute to OSS C++ projects I find this isn't true. Well, that goes contrary to my personal experience (professional dev in C…

  17. comment
    Comment #40736232

    This feels very shortsighted to me. "Easy to learn" and "easy to hire for" are an advantage in the first few weeks. Besides, we now have data indicating that ramp up time in Rust i…

  18. comment
    Comment #40551992

    Thank you for the answer! The limited range of compatibility of RAM components makes me wonder if the promise of upgradeability actually delivers

  19. comment
    Comment #40544167

    Hello, what kind of RAM is supported for the Intel configuration? I have a 32GB DDR4 SO DIMM 2400MHz sitting around, can I repurpose it for a new Framework config (and spare the co…

  20. comment
    Comment #40353085

    hey, thanks for posting my article :-) It's a bug postmortem about tokio and rayon. Would be interested to know if anybody else encountered similar issues with these libraries or m…

  21. story
  22. comment
    Comment #40220153

    More than just that, Result in general also prevents from accessing the value when there is an error and accessing an error when there is a value.

  23. comment
    Comment #40114849

    > But for those few cases you can add an annotation. not in other people's code. My main concern is that gradual typing makes understanding other people's code more difficult. Idio…

  24. comment
    Comment #40114811

    > Those who like explicit types can add as many annotations as they need in OCaml. They cannot add it in other people's libraries. > did not stop Python rising to conqueror the wor…

  25. comment
    Comment #40113329

    Global type inference is not a positive in my book. In my experience it becomes very hard to understand the types involved if they are not explicit at systems boundaries. I can als…