Viewing profile — dumpsterdiver
dumpsterdiver
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Feb 16, 2019, 1:28 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 982
- Public activity
- 965 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dumpsterdiver
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49104301
The irony may only just be unfolding - check out this paper from 2015: https://research.google/pubs/distilling-the-knowledge-in-a-n... # LLM generated summary of the implied irony …
-
comment
Comment #48417479
Can you imagine how cumbersome conversations would become if people felt obligated to qualify ad-hoc statements with what amounts to a historical ledger? Every new entry would open…
-
comment
Comment #48192781
Context matters a lot. I didn’t publish any papers, and didn’t even provide the context of the LLM mistakes I caught to later report on, so no, I was not guilty of reckless disrega…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48143673
I’ve disagreed with some of your other stances in this thread, but I want to acknowledge the validity of your take here. You’re right that a single hallucinated line is not evidenc…
-
comment
Comment #48142808
> One hallucinated citation does not in any way imply anyone is being left behind. The parent said “setting” others behind, which refers to lost time. Being “left” behind implies a…
-
comment
Comment #47995146
> Just because something can communicate in a way that you can interpret, doesnt mean something is conscious The phrase “the trap of anthropomorphism” betrays a rather dull premise…
-
comment
Comment #47929359
Are you trying to make a point that we should remain open to the possibility that humans can express themselves eloquently?
- comment
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #47582106
Reading back through my comments, I recognize that omitting the quotes around “free services” would have made my comment here more palatable, and less provocative. That was poor fo…
-
comment
Comment #47581512
> If everyone is running the same models, does this not favour white hat / defense? The landscape is turbulent (so this comment might be outdated by the time I submit it), but one …
-
comment
Comment #47434167
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #47423329
> should know there are countless technical and procedural ways to help prevent that sort of thing Sometimes when I look at code it feels like I was led into a weird surprise party…
-
comment
Comment #47421956
Do you have any justification in mind for the “free service” being funded by tax payers? Why should it be free for the people who need it, and why should tax payers fund it?
-
comment
Comment #47418398
Agreed. Imo, it is important to distinguish which parts of “everything” carry the weight of the concern. By doing that - we may be able to remove “LLM” from that equation entirely.…
-
comment
Comment #47408627
Imagine a future classroom defined by elaborate plays performed by curious parents, all on advanced adjacent learning paths themselves. An intertwined learning structure that just …
-
comment
Comment #47343336
To be fair, the English language is the real victim here. While “essential” cleanly maps to “can’t go without” - it doesn’t map to “bare minimum”. For instance, let’s assume you’re…
-
comment
Comment #47330884
You’re not alone. I went from being a mediocre security engineer to a full time reviewer of LLM code reviews last week. I just read reports and report on incomplete code all day. S…
-
comment
Comment #47227608
> The president has no authority to rename the Department of Defense, but he and his administration demand consensus under the threat of legal consequences. > they threatened Googl…
-
comment
Comment #47226369
What’s the intent of pointing out the presumed provenance in writing, now that LLMs are ubiquitous? Is it like one of those “Morning” nods, where two people cross paths and acknowl…
-
comment
Comment #47173500
> All that matters is that everyone calls it the Department of War, and regards it as such, which everyone does. What you just described is consensus, and framing it as fascism dam…
-
comment
Comment #47079353
To be fair, considering that the CoT exposed to users is a sanitized summary of the path traversal - one could argue that sanitized CoT is closer to hiding things than simply omitt…
-
comment
Comment #47078011
As models gain a deeper understanding of the physical world (e.g. Google world generator), I see nothing less than a new renaissance in our future. Forget about data centers, all t…