Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — dubbledidu

dubbledidu

HN member
Joined
Mon, Aug 12, 2013, 12:04 PM UTC
HN karma
32
Public activity
20 items

About dubbledidu

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #6258039

    > My advice is to look into things like Scala ... +1. I think one of the main differences the OP will enjoy is that Scala allows abstraction without the heavy indirection penalty J…

  2. comment
    Comment #6243504

    > So your post is meaningless and useless. Can I hand you some tissue so that you can get rid of your angry tears? That Go reality distortion field seems to be strong. > why didn't…

  3. comment
    Comment #6240107

    Yet another Go fanboy getting a bit defensive without having to add anything constructive? If you actually checked your “claims” you would see that people are singing so many prais…

  4. comment
    Comment #6239895

    > The lack of half-decent theming in Eclipse and > Preferences/Settings being all over the place > really puts me off ScalaIDE personally. Agree. I can recommend http://eclipsecolo…

  5. comment
    Comment #6237768

    * Their implementation sucks so much that most decently built concurrency implementation will beat Go-routines by a wide margin. Just have a look at all those people on the Go mail…

  6. comment
    Comment #6237063

    Did you ever actually use Go for a few minutes? Most of these bullet points are plain wrong.

  7. comment
    Comment #6234811

    Sort is just one instance where one can work around Go's limitations, this is not repeatable in general.

  8. comment
    Comment #6233667

    I think Google already had a lot fun with Oracle while not using their code. If you fork, be prepared for a patent-infringement lawsuit as soon as you earn some money with it. I'm …

  9. comment
    Comment #6233645

    The problem is that nobody trusts Oracle. Have a look at what happened to Google. Their code didn't even originate from Oracle and they still got sued for made-up, bullshit reasons…

  10. comment
    Comment #6233610

    I think the key point you are missing is developer productivity. Every potential performance gain C++ might have is completely negated by having to touch that complete clusterfuck …

  11. comment
    Comment #6232644

    Yes. The first slide basically guaranteed that I will never look into this project. The risk of touching anything Oracle-related is not worth the potential benefit.

  12. comment
    Comment #6216957

    Wrong, wrong, wrong and wrong.

  13. comment
    Comment #6213448

    It uses exactly as much memory as you specify. It would be pretty stupid to have plenty of RAM and NOT using it. With enough memory GC becomes essentially free, by not having to do…

  14. comment
    Comment #6213269

    It has gotten a lot better on all fronts.

  15. comment
    Comment #6205698

    Me too. This and all those Go fanboys make me really embarrassed of my profession.

  16. comment
    Comment #6199773

    This blog post is extremely vague and handwavy. Looking into the actual source code didn't reveal anything “special” either, so I'll just call bullshit on these claims. Feel free t…

  17. comment
    Comment #6199137

    That's my impression too. The lone sysadmin who has to hack something up and moves on to other work likes Go; real developers who work in teams and have to maintain their codebase …

  18. comment
    Comment #6199119

    > So, your comparison here is not fair. You should compare > Go's package management with Python plus > setuptools/easy_install, Java plus Maven, Haskell plus > Cabal, etc. That ma…

  19. comment
    Comment #6198738

    OO subtyping is hard to reason about formally in formal systems _in general_.

  20. comment
    Comment #6198728

    Eh... what exactly is "lightweight" about your threads? As far as I see you still use the same, standard JVM threads everyone uses, combined with a thread pool. What am I missing?