Viewing profile — dtrizzle
dtrizzle
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jun 08, 2010, 9:37 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 183
- Public activity
- 62 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dtrizzle
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46304805
The plain text idea is brilliant and something I've been thinking about for a while. If they could do this, it would reduce storage and transmission costs of the courts various cas…
-
comment
Comment #40301290
Quick note: "On May 6, 2024, the California State Court accept our claim." The court where you filed your lawsuit is a federal court, not a state court. Specifically, it's the U.S.…
-
comment
Comment #39634964
Cal, not Carl.
-
comment
Comment #34728486
I agree with selling to corporations. However, most big law lawyers will need a higher level of PDF functionality. At a quick glance, I notice that the tools can't manipulate bookm…
-
comment
Comment #34484930
There is a slight mistake above. The person who represents Coca Cola may not be a licensed attorney, even if they work for the corporation. (See Code of Civ. Proc., § 116.530, subd…
-
comment
Comment #34375435
This has been an issue in criminal prosecutions. Breath machine: You are over a .08 BAC. Defendant: No I wasn't. Let me see the source code. Courts and companies: NO! It's secret. …
-
comment
Comment #33308982
Looks like the people who are grandfathered in are people who paid for web access. If you purchased the Android or iOS app (like me), you are not grandfathered in and do not get a …
-
comment
Comment #32527502
The idea that encryption algorithms need to be well tested over time is why many security experts do not trust Telegram's encryption algorithm (MTProto).
-
comment
Comment #31227590
You are not wrong. But in this case there was a significant amount of contemporaneous reporting when Ive left, predating this book.
-
comment
Comment #30920572
The iPhone. The end.
-
comment
Comment #30198105
No Gmail.
-
comment
Comment #28520410
Zune!
-
comment
Comment #27241407
The Federal Rules of Evidence permit a judge to question witnesses in addition to the parties. See Rule 614 linked below. And I think you mean plaintiff. A prosecutor generally ref…
-
comment
Comment #25925202
This project reminded me a proselint, which appears to be a similar style checker. Sadly, that project appears to have been inactive for at least three years. https://github.com/am…
-
comment
Comment #25581780
They still have a tremendous amount of power and other companies should still fear them. For example, Microsoft Teams versus Slack.
-
comment
Comment #25581710
Microsoft might not be the leader that it once was but they've done a very good job of reinventing themselves. It's a little unfair to call them dead.
- story
-
comment
Comment #17693848
Non-paywall: http://archive.is/j6f3G
- story
-
comment
Comment #17650570
ghost.js
-
comment
Comment #16402670
The warrant requirement for content online, while good for privacy, absolutely hobbles criminal defendants. I pointed out this troubling issue years ago in a similar thread: https:…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #14313750
I'm pretty sure the Arizona legislature changed the law to make it clear that Zestimates were lawful. http://supreme.findlaw.com/legal-commentary/must-zillow-the-...
-
comment
Comment #14261634
Thomas’s dissent is not about whether as a policy matter, someone should receive their money back. I suspect everyone thinks the Petitioners’ should get refunds. Rather, it’s about…