Viewing profile — dstaesse
dstaesse
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Oct 12, 2018, 5:13 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 13
- Public activity
- 11 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About dstaesse
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #23084827
The 4,5,7 -- depending on who you ask --layer model is nothing but pseudoscience. https://ouroboros.rocks/docs/overview/
- story
-
comment
Comment #22072142
Well, fair enough. Let me explain a bit how it would be done. Finding the "first packets" is not as easy as you may think. The two fields in the network protocol that matter are th…
-
comment
Comment #22060777
Sure. It's an odds game. But, do you have a counter-example where sending the source address in every packet has better privacy than not doing so? As another fun addition, we inves…
-
comment
Comment #22060457
I'm sorry to disappoint, but we are not looking at commercializing... Ouroboros will remain free "as in beer" and free "as in freedom". I do take "spiffy" as a compliment :)
-
comment
Comment #22060219
thank you :)
-
comment
Comment #22060019
In most of our Ouroboros deployments (meaning: in the lab) we did just that. We use a raw packet interface (bpf on mac, raw sockets on linux) and send Ouroboros traffic on top of E…
-
comment
Comment #22058766
I looked at Quantumgate and it looks interesting :) Thanks for the pointer!
-
comment
Comment #22058575
I'm one of the developers. Thank you all for your interest in this project. This website is still under construction, and we're well aware that it's severely lacking in information…
-
comment
Comment #21098872
Sorry, my response was rather cryptic. I was more referring to the interface having both an L2 and L3 address. From an academic perspective, I agree with OP that assigning the L3 a…
-
comment
Comment #21096249
Any architecture that needs two different identifiers for the same thing is very likely in need of some revision.